11-23-2003, 08:21 PM
While the BJP is less anti-hindu than others, in most ways it resembles the
congress of 1947 - Nehru
Which was opposed to Nehru's muslim appeasement, but not aimed at muslim extermination
Advani attended his niece's Nikah to a muslim
The agenda of BJP is not extermination or expulsion of muslims
It is getting Indian muslims to accept cultural nationalism,
a-la Indonesian muslims, stop identifying with foreign invaders and so on
Syed Shahabuddin is well aware of this and even he admitted in an interview with
foreign journalists that neither liquidation nor forced conversion is on the agenda
of the sangh parivar
What the sangh parivar does not understand is that accepting cultural nationalism
or accepting that muslim invaders did misdeeds will unravel islam
and hence is being bitterly opposed by mullahs
Mullahs for example teach the curriculum of Shah Wali-ullah in all madrasas
Shah Wali-ullah called for forced conversion of hindus
To my understanding the sangh parivar has no idea of practical and realistic methods to defang islamic fundamentalism
It is being unfairly tarnished by the psecs for simply observing correctly that
islamic fundamentalism is not a fringe phenomenon and is a threat to hindus
In a recent muslim abduction case in bihar, I tried working with the sangh parivar and discovered that it has no muscle power
It does function as an early news alert service
It warned against muslim demographic warfare, article 370, BD illegals and ISI activities by Indian muslims ,since about 1960
About 80% of the efforts of the sangh parivar is focused on sewa activities
While it did fight against muslims in 1947 in Punjab and kashmir, that was not its main function and in both those cases, the congress supplied weapons to RSS to fight the islamists
Even in the Gujurat riots, VHP has branches in 10,000 villages and only 200 villages saw riots. Meaning in 98% of cases, VHP did not take part in riots
In the Gujurat hindu retaliation, in many cases the mobs were led by local
hindu congressmen
Even in Gujurat, islamists have not been fully defanged, they still do low level rioting every day
Naredra Modi does not have absolute power in Gujurat
He is hounded by psec media and psec supreme court
Further he is subject to the Indian constitution
Modi is less fascistic than CPM in WB and Lalloo and Mulayam
In many tribal villages, muslim money lenders and landlords exploit hindu tribals
The leftist EPW admitted last year that if the oppressors were hindus, the tribals would have been justified in doing much more violence, but it disapproved of the violence because muslims were on the receiving end
Last year, 2 million hindus rioted in Gujurat
The sangh parivar does not have 2 million members in Gujurat
What happened was that on a local basis, hindus who had been suffering low level muslim harassment for decades decided to take local revenge after Godhra raised emotions
congress of 1947 - Nehru
Which was opposed to Nehru's muslim appeasement, but not aimed at muslim extermination
Advani attended his niece's Nikah to a muslim
The agenda of BJP is not extermination or expulsion of muslims
It is getting Indian muslims to accept cultural nationalism,
a-la Indonesian muslims, stop identifying with foreign invaders and so on
Syed Shahabuddin is well aware of this and even he admitted in an interview with
foreign journalists that neither liquidation nor forced conversion is on the agenda
of the sangh parivar
What the sangh parivar does not understand is that accepting cultural nationalism
or accepting that muslim invaders did misdeeds will unravel islam
and hence is being bitterly opposed by mullahs
Mullahs for example teach the curriculum of Shah Wali-ullah in all madrasas
Shah Wali-ullah called for forced conversion of hindus
To my understanding the sangh parivar has no idea of practical and realistic methods to defang islamic fundamentalism
It is being unfairly tarnished by the psecs for simply observing correctly that
islamic fundamentalism is not a fringe phenomenon and is a threat to hindus
In a recent muslim abduction case in bihar, I tried working with the sangh parivar and discovered that it has no muscle power
It does function as an early news alert service
It warned against muslim demographic warfare, article 370, BD illegals and ISI activities by Indian muslims ,since about 1960
About 80% of the efforts of the sangh parivar is focused on sewa activities
While it did fight against muslims in 1947 in Punjab and kashmir, that was not its main function and in both those cases, the congress supplied weapons to RSS to fight the islamists
Even in the Gujurat riots, VHP has branches in 10,000 villages and only 200 villages saw riots. Meaning in 98% of cases, VHP did not take part in riots
In the Gujurat hindu retaliation, in many cases the mobs were led by local
hindu congressmen
Even in Gujurat, islamists have not been fully defanged, they still do low level rioting every day
Naredra Modi does not have absolute power in Gujurat
He is hounded by psec media and psec supreme court
Further he is subject to the Indian constitution
Modi is less fascistic than CPM in WB and Lalloo and Mulayam
In many tribal villages, muslim money lenders and landlords exploit hindu tribals
The leftist EPW admitted last year that if the oppressors were hindus, the tribals would have been justified in doing much more violence, but it disapproved of the violence because muslims were on the receiving end
Last year, 2 million hindus rioted in Gujurat
The sangh parivar does not have 2 million members in Gujurat
What happened was that on a local basis, hindus who had been suffering low level muslim harassment for decades decided to take local revenge after Godhra raised emotions