Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population?
#15
The main weapon of islam is demographic warfare

Muslims flip into Jihadist mode, when they cross a given critical mass

This critical mass is a function of the organisation and militancy of the host society



For example in UK, where they are just 2%, they are terrorising white natives,

attacking cops and ethnic cleansing natives



I will go further and claim that the external muslim is not a threat

( except for the handful of chinese supplied nukes to pakistan )



In muslim countries the main function of the army is to protect the ruling regime

and not to fight the external enemy

Hence the muslim armies are very good at killing their own civilians

and in general manage to lose most wars





Since 1680, muslim armies have lost about 95% of their battles to kafirs

Chinese, sikhs, hindus, europeans etc



We cant control the fertility of pakistani and bangladeshi muslims who will immigrate into India

Even the US cant control its borders



Illegal immigration happens only if the host society has a demographic vacuum



The 15 million BD illegals means that India has a demographic vacuum that they are filling



The only solution is to engage in demographic warfare, unpleasant as it sounds

By counter demographic warfare, you dilute the islam % below critical mass

Further demographic warfare is the last hope of islam, Once contained demographically, it will start to implode



Dr.Mahathir and his wife are both doctors and they have 7 kids

Hence 5-6 kids is a safe number for hindus

In 1970 Sudhir Luxman Hendre a hindutva activist asked for hindus to have 5-6 kids



In fact demographic warfare is the only reason we had partition in the first place



When muslim rule ended in 1800, muslims were just 15% of Akhand Bharat

a society 15% muslim will be riot prone and unpleasant, but not enough to create partition

By single minded reproduction they grew to 25% in 1947 which made them strong enough to partition

The case of bengal is particularly noteworthy

When the british took over bengal, muslims were just 30% of bengal,

The foolish bengali hindu did not remarry widows and westernised and reduced fertility

By sheer demographic warfare, muslims became majority in United bengal by 1881

and this resulted in creation of BD and resultant ethnic cleansing of hindus

The message is clear, either have 5-6 kids or be ethnic cleansed like the BD hindus



In fact failure to fight a demographic war by hindus and sikhs will result in need to actually fight a civil war a-la lebanon



per NFHS-2, by birth, muslims are

15.9% of India

43% of Assam

33% of Kerala and WB

22% of UP and Bihar

North India is doomed to fight a civil war by 2050



My personal recommendation is to evacuate the 13 million BD hindus to de-islamise WB and the north east and drop muslim % by 7-8% in those regions



The case of kerala shows very clearly the foolishness of hindus

From 1901-1961, muslims were flat at 17%

This is true in most states

1961 census is an inflexion point in muslim demographics in residual India

when foolish hindus took up family planning

Then the kerala hindu did too much family planning and this resulted in muslims being 33% by birth in kerala



It is also possible to defeat islamic demographic warfare

In JK, hindus have a higher fertility than muslims and in MP and Rajasthan and a few other states have minimal fertility differential



Then we come to the issue of Malthusian limits of India

China has twice the agricultural produce of India grown on half the agricultural land

Hence by raising agricultural productivity to chinese levels India can feed 5 billion



Next India is much less crowded than south korea

Further India can export surplus population illegally to the demographically dying west like the muslims are doing



By 2050, muslims will be 16% of India, 25% of residual Israel ( within 1967 borders ), 25% of France, 25% of Russia, 16% of western Europe and 36% of south asia



Yes, hindus were foolish in not completing population exchange

but the west is even more foolish in allowing muslim immigration and dropping their own fertility. Fortunately rural hindus did not take up family planning in large numbers



Bosnia too is a case of islamic demographics leading to civil war

Muslims expanded from 25% in 1951 to 40% by 1991





As far as internal muslims are concerned we need active containment of islamists,

ruthless law enforcement and innovative ways to weaken the hold of the mullah

for without the brainwashing of the mullah, the muslims dont flip into Jihadism
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-14-2003, 02:40 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-14-2003, 03:04 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-14-2003, 03:21 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-14-2003, 03:28 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-14-2003, 07:37 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-14-2003, 07:50 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-14-2003, 08:14 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-15-2003, 08:51 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-17-2003, 03:09 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-18-2003, 03:55 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-19-2003, 12:12 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by G.Subramaniam - 11-19-2003, 03:24 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-19-2003, 07:24 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-22-2003, 03:28 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-22-2003, 04:02 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-22-2003, 06:31 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-22-2003, 10:12 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-23-2003, 10:57 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 11-23-2003, 11:36 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-25-2003, 12:28 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-25-2003, 04:42 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-25-2003, 04:46 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-25-2003, 05:10 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-25-2003, 08:22 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 09:12 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 10:16 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 10:31 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 10:36 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 10:56 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 11:01 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 11:04 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 11:07 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 11:15 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 11:21 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 11:25 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 11:29 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-30-2003, 11:30 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-31-2003, 01:44 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-31-2003, 02:15 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-31-2003, 03:51 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-31-2003, 05:38 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-01-2004, 04:08 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-01-2004, 04:03 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-15-2004, 01:14 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-15-2004, 03:34 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-15-2004, 04:43 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-15-2004, 06:13 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-15-2004, 07:32 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-21-2004, 03:42 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-21-2004, 04:18 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-21-2004, 04:22 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-22-2004, 03:29 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-22-2004, 05:19 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-22-2004, 06:13 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-22-2004, 06:24 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-22-2004, 06:55 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-22-2004, 06:15 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-22-2004, 06:20 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 02-02-2004, 05:10 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 02-02-2004, 06:57 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 04-11-2004, 04:21 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 04-30-2004, 03:09 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 04-30-2004, 03:22 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 03-02-2005, 06:21 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 08-25-2005, 02:24 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 04-02-2007, 10:48 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-17-2008, 02:18 PM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 12-31-2003, 02:25 AM
Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population? - by Guest - 01-02-2004, 05:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)