11-18-2003, 05:35 AM
In Ambedkar's book
"Pakistan or the Partition of India"
available on-line at [url="http://www.ambedkar.org"]http://www.ambedkar.org[/url]
Partition was a necessary step to stop the islamisation of India
He argued very correctly, that a society 25% muslim, 36% muslim in legislature, army and police is dangerously vulnerable to islamic takeover
So even without transfer of population, it should be viewed as a successful hindu secession movement. Full population transfer is simply icing on the cake
Islamists like Maulana Azad and Madudi, from an islamic standpoint opposed partition, since they felt that they could takeover India from within
The 20 million BD illegals are a small taste of Akhand Bharat or shall I say
Akhand Islamistan
Dr.Ambedkar argued quite rightly that after amputation of east and west pakistan, Indian muslim rioting propensity will be drastically reduced
And he was correct
All communal riots since 1949, have ONLY killed 20000,
The 5 days of rioting on Direct Action Day killed 20000
Next the boundaries that Dr.Ambedkar proposed was very close to final radcliffe line
He said full population exchange was the only cure for the internal muslim problem, however he added that even without a full population transfer, getting rid of 70% of south asian muslims would be a huge advantage of partition
He actually proposed a limited population exchange in Punjab and Bengal
He correctly foresaw in 1940 that non-muslims would be genocided in east and west pakistan
In 1940, muslims were 13% of residual India
A population transfer between east and west punjab would reduce it to 10%
and a population transfer between east and west bengal would reduce it to 7%
So going by his advice muslims would have been reduced to 7% in residual India
The exchange did not take place in bengal, and muslims were just reduced to 10% in 1951 in residual India
The population exchange in Punjab reduced muslims in residual India so much that
despite demographic warfare and BD illegals they just have managed to climb back to 13%, the same point as in 1941, in residual India
If the bengal exchange had taken place, muslims would have been at 10% today and ending at 13% by 2050
Thanks to the foolishness of bengali hindus, not only did the transfer not take place
the bengali hindus imported 15 million BD islamists
While 100% of Sindhis and 40% of sikhs and bengali hindus got screwed,
Partition was a huge hindu victory from the view point of princely states
In totality, ONLY 5% of non-muslims were trapped in east and west pakistan and 70% of muslims were removed. In short it was a very clean amputation of a gangrene as per Sardar Patel
Without partition, the muslim league would not have allowed removal of Nizam and other muslim kingdoms
Further without partition, East Punjab, Haryana, Himachal, West bengal would be under muslim rule, with non-muslims slowly being driven out as in JK
Pre-partition, 64 million non-muslims ( 20% ) were trapped under muslim rule
After partition, ONLY 16 million non-muslims ( 5% ) were trapped under muslim rule
The area gained by annexing muslim nawabdoms was about
100,000 sq.miles, twice the area of BD
Pakistan while it looks large on the map is 80% desert
In short partition fenced off 70% of muslims into 2 dense ghettos
While we may argue about the mistakes in partition such as not grabbing a few more districts or not finishing the population transfer, given the weak and chaotic nature of the congress, thanks to a few patriots like Savarkar, Master Tara Singh,
Bordoloi and Syama Prasad Mukerji, pakistan was trimmed in size and most non-muslims rescued
Yes we are stuck with a 13% muslim population
but lets look at how other countries fare, when they foolishly let in muslims
1. In Philipines, Thailand, Myanmar, they have 5% muslims and all have a muslim secessionist movement
2. In western Europe, muslims are 5% and they do 70% of rapes, attack cops, ethnic cleanse natives. In western europe, muslims are 12% by birth
3. In France, muslims are 10% and 20% by birth
4. In Russia, muslims are 10% and 20% by birth
5. In Australia and UK, muslims are 2% and they riot and ethnic cleanse natives
and attack cops
6. In Israel, ( within 1967 borders )
muslims are 15%, and 22% by birth and they riot and attack cops and do treason
Looking at the developing scenario in other countries, in India, muslims dont go into Jihadist mode till they hit 20% of a locality
Since we have co-evolved with a predatory ideology like islam, for centuries, hindu society has evolved coping mechanisms ( not perfect of course )
The 21st century will be the age of muslim civil wars as the islam % in a host society climbs thanks to illegal immigration and fertility differentials
Unfortunately the only means of countering this is counter-demographic warfare and filling in ecological niches before muslims
Next we have to look at the case of Spain
Spain took 120 years and many civil wars and inquisitions to eradicate islam
Now muslims are coming back by illegal immigration and are 2% of spain
Muslims have started riots in spain
Next we look at Greece
Greece exchanged its population with Turkey
( Dr.Ambedkar viewed this as the ideal model )
But thanks to illegal immigration, muslims are seeping back into greece and rioting
So in the long term, neither Greece nor Spain solved their muslim problem
Further, external muslim countries are enjoined to do jihad
So as long as islam exists, kafirs will face violence either from within or without
Borders cant be sealed
So the only option for the kafir is raise fertility, organise and militarise
In practical terms an active containment policy towards islam similar to the
containment policy against communism, while at the same time helping muslims escape the shackles of the mullah
Going by the record of xtianity, it took them 350 years from the start of the
renaissance to the end of the inquisition and it will take centuries for the hold of the mullah to weaken
For instance Judaism, circa 100 AD was very similar to islam and we had
jewish zealots similar to islamic jihadists, but over many centuries judaism evolved away from a literal interpretation of their texts
So in the Indian context what does this mean
1. Arresting rabble rousing muslim leaders, mullahs and mafias
2. Frequent checks on madrasas
3. Raising a 2 million man paramilitary to patrol muslim zones to deter muslim rioting. Given the muslim track record of starting 80% of riots, preventing muslim rioting will also prevent hindu counter-rioting
For instance in Godhra, muslims have been rioting since at least 1928, almost 1 major riot every 2 years and no action was taken to control the islamists
This paramilitary can consist of ex-servicemen who are retired from army at 35, but still fit for these kinds of work
4. Scholarships to muslim women
Educated women weaken the power of the mullah
5. Getting Grameen like programs to the benefit of muslim women
Working women weaken the power of the mullah
6. Enforcing laws on muslim ghettos, many of which are no-go zones
7. Finally raising kafir fertility to prevent demographic vacuums and contain islam demographically
"Pakistan or the Partition of India"
available on-line at [url="http://www.ambedkar.org"]http://www.ambedkar.org[/url]
Partition was a necessary step to stop the islamisation of India
He argued very correctly, that a society 25% muslim, 36% muslim in legislature, army and police is dangerously vulnerable to islamic takeover
So even without transfer of population, it should be viewed as a successful hindu secession movement. Full population transfer is simply icing on the cake
Islamists like Maulana Azad and Madudi, from an islamic standpoint opposed partition, since they felt that they could takeover India from within
The 20 million BD illegals are a small taste of Akhand Bharat or shall I say
Akhand Islamistan
Dr.Ambedkar argued quite rightly that after amputation of east and west pakistan, Indian muslim rioting propensity will be drastically reduced
And he was correct
All communal riots since 1949, have ONLY killed 20000,
The 5 days of rioting on Direct Action Day killed 20000
Next the boundaries that Dr.Ambedkar proposed was very close to final radcliffe line
He said full population exchange was the only cure for the internal muslim problem, however he added that even without a full population transfer, getting rid of 70% of south asian muslims would be a huge advantage of partition
He actually proposed a limited population exchange in Punjab and Bengal
He correctly foresaw in 1940 that non-muslims would be genocided in east and west pakistan
In 1940, muslims were 13% of residual India
A population transfer between east and west punjab would reduce it to 10%
and a population transfer between east and west bengal would reduce it to 7%
So going by his advice muslims would have been reduced to 7% in residual India
The exchange did not take place in bengal, and muslims were just reduced to 10% in 1951 in residual India
The population exchange in Punjab reduced muslims in residual India so much that
despite demographic warfare and BD illegals they just have managed to climb back to 13%, the same point as in 1941, in residual India
If the bengal exchange had taken place, muslims would have been at 10% today and ending at 13% by 2050
Thanks to the foolishness of bengali hindus, not only did the transfer not take place
the bengali hindus imported 15 million BD islamists
While 100% of Sindhis and 40% of sikhs and bengali hindus got screwed,
Partition was a huge hindu victory from the view point of princely states
In totality, ONLY 5% of non-muslims were trapped in east and west pakistan and 70% of muslims were removed. In short it was a very clean amputation of a gangrene as per Sardar Patel
Without partition, the muslim league would not have allowed removal of Nizam and other muslim kingdoms
Further without partition, East Punjab, Haryana, Himachal, West bengal would be under muslim rule, with non-muslims slowly being driven out as in JK
Pre-partition, 64 million non-muslims ( 20% ) were trapped under muslim rule
After partition, ONLY 16 million non-muslims ( 5% ) were trapped under muslim rule
The area gained by annexing muslim nawabdoms was about
100,000 sq.miles, twice the area of BD
Pakistan while it looks large on the map is 80% desert
In short partition fenced off 70% of muslims into 2 dense ghettos
While we may argue about the mistakes in partition such as not grabbing a few more districts or not finishing the population transfer, given the weak and chaotic nature of the congress, thanks to a few patriots like Savarkar, Master Tara Singh,
Bordoloi and Syama Prasad Mukerji, pakistan was trimmed in size and most non-muslims rescued
Yes we are stuck with a 13% muslim population
but lets look at how other countries fare, when they foolishly let in muslims
1. In Philipines, Thailand, Myanmar, they have 5% muslims and all have a muslim secessionist movement
2. In western Europe, muslims are 5% and they do 70% of rapes, attack cops, ethnic cleanse natives. In western europe, muslims are 12% by birth
3. In France, muslims are 10% and 20% by birth
4. In Russia, muslims are 10% and 20% by birth
5. In Australia and UK, muslims are 2% and they riot and ethnic cleanse natives
and attack cops
6. In Israel, ( within 1967 borders )
muslims are 15%, and 22% by birth and they riot and attack cops and do treason
Looking at the developing scenario in other countries, in India, muslims dont go into Jihadist mode till they hit 20% of a locality
Since we have co-evolved with a predatory ideology like islam, for centuries, hindu society has evolved coping mechanisms ( not perfect of course )
The 21st century will be the age of muslim civil wars as the islam % in a host society climbs thanks to illegal immigration and fertility differentials
Unfortunately the only means of countering this is counter-demographic warfare and filling in ecological niches before muslims
Next we have to look at the case of Spain
Spain took 120 years and many civil wars and inquisitions to eradicate islam
Now muslims are coming back by illegal immigration and are 2% of spain
Muslims have started riots in spain
Next we look at Greece
Greece exchanged its population with Turkey
( Dr.Ambedkar viewed this as the ideal model )
But thanks to illegal immigration, muslims are seeping back into greece and rioting
So in the long term, neither Greece nor Spain solved their muslim problem
Further, external muslim countries are enjoined to do jihad
So as long as islam exists, kafirs will face violence either from within or without
Borders cant be sealed
So the only option for the kafir is raise fertility, organise and militarise
In practical terms an active containment policy towards islam similar to the
containment policy against communism, while at the same time helping muslims escape the shackles of the mullah
Going by the record of xtianity, it took them 350 years from the start of the
renaissance to the end of the inquisition and it will take centuries for the hold of the mullah to weaken
For instance Judaism, circa 100 AD was very similar to islam and we had
jewish zealots similar to islamic jihadists, but over many centuries judaism evolved away from a literal interpretation of their texts
So in the Indian context what does this mean
1. Arresting rabble rousing muslim leaders, mullahs and mafias
2. Frequent checks on madrasas
3. Raising a 2 million man paramilitary to patrol muslim zones to deter muslim rioting. Given the muslim track record of starting 80% of riots, preventing muslim rioting will also prevent hindu counter-rioting
For instance in Godhra, muslims have been rioting since at least 1928, almost 1 major riot every 2 years and no action was taken to control the islamists
This paramilitary can consist of ex-servicemen who are retired from army at 35, but still fit for these kinds of work
4. Scholarships to muslim women
Educated women weaken the power of the mullah
5. Getting Grameen like programs to the benefit of muslim women
Working women weaken the power of the mullah
6. Enforcing laws on muslim ghettos, many of which are no-go zones
7. Finally raising kafir fertility to prevent demographic vacuums and contain islam demographically