![]() |
|
History of the Maratha nation - Printable Version +- Forums (https://india-forum.com) +-- Forum: Indian History & Culture (https://india-forum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Indian History (https://india-forum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Thread: History of the Maratha nation (/showthread.php?tid=583) |
History of the Maratha nation - dhu - 12-14-2006 ben ami your pm is not working. please go ahead and ask your questions here or send me an email. HV is originating in Kashmir according to Oppenheimer. Kashyap from the Noida institute, although he rightly lambasts AIT, seems to have fallen for indo-scythian origin game started by one Dixit. History of the Maratha nation - Hauma Hamiddha - 12-27-2006 This remarkable issue was brought to my attention by a person who specifically wishes to remain un-named on these pages on account of certain private reasons related to this narrative. It is clear that Shahji was a rather distinguished military leader and he had transmitted this genetically influenced trait to not only his famous son Shivaji, but also the forgotten elder son Sambhaji. In reality he also passed these genes on to another son who has been largely forgotten in modern Maharatta histories. When Shahji was was in Bijapur having left his wife in the environs of Pune, he secretly took up a woman of unknown provenance as a sexual partner. This fact would have been quite improper for a well-bred Maratha of the era, and was accordingly hushed up, except for the Shedgaonkar bakhar that explicitly mentions it. As a result of this union was born a son called Anandrao Bhosle. He was placed in the custody of the young deshastha brAhmaNa Venkoji Datto and subsequently served in the Shahji's command at Bijapur in his early youth. He and Venkoji Datto then left Shahji's service and moved over to Pune and enrolled themselves with Shivaji to defend the Hindu Svarajya. The Sabhasad chronicle also confirms this by mentioning that mentions that "Venkoji Datto, an able brahmin officer of great accomplishment, and Shahji's son Anandrao joined Shivaji's service at Pune after leaving Shahji at Bijapur". Shivaji appointed both of them to the rank of Panch-hazari (commander of 5000), which was a high rank in the Maratha army of the time that could possibly be attained only due high military ability or perhaps genetic relationship in the case of Anandrao. In any case Anandrao clearly proved himself to be of high military distinction. They were placed under the Sarnobat of the Maratha army, Prataprao Gujjar and marched with him for the attack on Surat. Following the plundering of Surat, Daud Khan Quereshi led the Moslem hordes along with Ikhlas Khan and suddenly ambushed Shivaji between Vani and Dindori in Northern Maharashtra. Shivaji quickly divided his forces into four divisions and began harrying the Mughals avoiding open confrontation. He personally led one division, even as he gave command of another to Anandrao. Anandrao distinguished himself on the field by leading the Marathas to safety when the Mogols pressed with great ferocity on his division. This distractionary move allowed Shivaji to personally attack the Mogol army after his division united with that of Anandrao's and kill 3000 Moslems in the encounter that followed. Subsequently, Awrangzeb arranged for a combined attack on the Marathas by the divisions of Daud Khan, Ikhlas Khan, Diler Khan and Bahadur Khan. Diler Khan began a systematic massacre of Hindus in the vicinity of Pune to draw Shivaji away while Ikhlas Khan took Salheri and Mulher forts in the north. In the fierce encounter Shivaji's childhood friend Suryarao Kakde was killed. Shivaji immediately dispatched his brAhmaNa prime minister Moropant Pingle along with Prataprao and Anandrao to destroy Ikhlas Khan. They took the Mogol army on the open field -- an important point in Hindu history because it showed the Marathas were now fully capable of engaging the one of the best equipped and most ably lead forces of the world in plain open combat. Anandrao showed exemplary valor in this this battle in which the Mogols face a major defeat with several thousands dead. This phenomenal victory, one the greatest of Shivaji's army, was in no small part due to the strategy and on-field leadership of the brAhmaNa Moropant Pingle, but the valor of Anandrao and Prataprao on the field were equally important. They captured the Mogol general Ikhlas Khan on the field. As result Anandrao was elevated to the peculiar rank of Haft-hazari- a rank that was for all practical purposes equivalent to the Sarnobat himself. This unusual rank, which Shivaji rarely awarded at that time, again shows that there was some special deal about Anandrao. After the brAhmaNa officer Ravlekar conquered the fort of Panhala, the Adil Shahis were shaken and dispatched their ace general Bahlol Khan to retake the fort. The Mogols immediately made common cause with the Moslem brethren to attack the Maharattas, and held a meeting to plan a combined strike on the Marathas. But Shivaji got wind of this plan and dispatched his half-brother Anandrao and commander Prataprao, each with around 7500 troops to preemptively attack Bijapur. The Maratha generals rapidly surged forth fell on Bahlol Khan at Umrani close to Bijapur before the Mogols could join him. On a hot April day the Marathas caught off the water supply of the Moslems and fell upon them in a combined attack by Prataprao and Anandrao. The Moslems were completely outclassed in the fierce battle, the Marathas routed them and Bahlol Khan was completely surrounded by the former. He secretly sent a message to Prataprao saying that he had no intention to fight Shivaji and was only making a show. Prataprao foolishly fell to the ploy and let Bahlol Khan go scotch-free. Prataprao then continued on to invade the Kanada country. Bahlol Khan retaliated with a replenished army and defeated the Maratha army. A little later on vijaya dashami day Shivaji worshiped bhavAnI and initiated a new campaign as he saw it as holy moment for war. He invaded the Kanada country again with the aim of taking both the uplands and the coast, when he got the news that Bahlol let off by his Sarnobat was returning to attack him. Furious, Shivaji sent a stinging letter to Prataprao that he need not show his face again until he destroyed Bahlol Khan. Prataprao pricked by the letter sought Bahlol and learned that he was fording the pass of Nessari just south of Kolhapur. He responded impulsively and charged at the Moslems with just 6 other men leaving the rest of his army far behind. What followed was a disastrous encounter in which the seven heroes went down fight in a blaze, leaving a trail of slaughtered enemy troops. Shivaji was deeply regretted his letter that lead to his ace general's death and made sure that his clansmen were well-provided and promised Rajaram to Prataprao's daughter. Anandrao Bhosle was now made acting Sarnobat and Shivaji asked him to punish the Moslems severely. He ably rallied the dejected Maratha troops. He made a deep thrust into the Bijapur territory and bore down on Bahlol Khan. At this point the Mogol army under Diler Khan came to the aid of Bahlol Khan and fell on Anandrao. Anandrao seeing himself outnumbered decided to resort to the classic tactic of feigned retreat like that used by the Mongols and with his cavalry rode into Karnataka at extraordinary speed. The Khans unable to keep up gave up, with Bahlol Khan retreating to Kohlapur which had taken earlier and Dilir retreating northwards after a failed attempt on Panhala. Within a month Anandrao struck at Sampgaon near Bankapur which was Bahlol Khan's jagir and looted his treasury carrying away 150,000 gold coins and 3000 ox-loads of other plunder. He demolished a Dutch outpost there and plundered it. Alarmed Bahlol Khan and Khizr Khan tried to intercept Anandrao but the Marathas strongly retaliated killing Khizr Khan and his brother and putting to flight Bahlol Khan. In the process the Anandrao captured several war-elephants, several hundreds of horses and their cash reserves. He then avoided any further brushes with the enemy and rapidly retreated to the Maratha territory. Soon there after Shivaji held a grand review of troops at Chiplun in the Konkan and appointed Hambirrao Mohite as the Sarnobat in place of Prataprao, recognizing his great deeds in the attack on the Mogols during the invasion of Baglana, Khandesh and Ahmedabad. Anandrao also played a notable role in the campaigns of Shivaji in South India: In early 1678 Anandrao led a division of troops along with Shivaji in the capture of Lakshmeshvar and Gadag in Karnatak from the Adilshahi control. In middle of the same year he along with the able brAhmaNa general Hanumante conquered the fort of Vellore and took the region. He was then sent north by Shivaji in the next year to deal with the Mogol garrison in central Maharastra near Akola. He scored a great victory on the Mogols capturing the fort of Balapur from them. Then in late 1679 when Dilir Khan invaded Bijapur, the British simultaneously attacked the Marathas on the West coat. Shivaji facing a possible 3 front war personally invaded Khandesh along with Hambirrao Mohite to counter-attack the Mogols while he sent Anandrao with 10,000 troops to pincer the Mogols by appearing before Bijapur. Angre was dispatched to lead the Maratha navy against the Britons. Anandrao moved just south of Pandharpur and attacked the Mogol army. Through a constant series of harrying attacks he kept frustrating his attempts to besiege Bijapur. Dilir to his alarm realized that he might be caught between two Maharatta armies escaped by making a westwards diversion in course of which he slaughtered many Hindus. After this last successful attack on the Mogols trying to besiege Bijapur Anandrao Bhosle passes out of Maratha history. The accounts indicate that clearly he had, like his elder half-brother, inherited Shahji military abilities and wasa notable commander of Shivaji, probably as capable of Hambirrao himself. Yet, most Maharatta accounts are rather silent about him. Further, while Shivaji clearly trusting him with many important operations, and appointing him to an unusual high command, never really made him Sarnobat, even though he briefly acted in this capacity. Why was this ? Perhaps his birth outside the wedlock was a black mark that precluded him from occupying such a rank without a scandal. Perhaps Shivaji was also concerned that his blood relationship to Anandrao might have possible consequences on his successors if he legitimized his half-brother with a formal high appointment. History of the Maratha nation - Bharatvarsh - 01-01-2007 <!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->(Nanasaheb's letters) 1. When I read your letter I was simply thrilled with joy. Indeed I felt mightily happy. I cannot express all that fully in a letter. Literally my mind was flooded with thoughts. All the territory from the river Attock to the Indian Ocean is the land of Hindus and not of the Turks. These have been our frontiers from the times of Pandavas down to those of Vikramaditya. They preserved and enjoyed it. After them the rulers turned out to be quite effete and the Yavanas ( Mohammedans ) rose in power. The Moghuls seized the Kingdom of Hastinapur. And eventually during the regime of Alamgir we were reduced to such straits that the wearer of every Yandyopavita (the sacred thread) was required to pay a jijeya tax of Rs. 3-8 and to buy cooked food. At such a juncture was born Shivaji Maharaj, the founder of the era and the protector of the religion. However his mission was confined to a limited area. Then came Nanasaheb and Bhausaheb of respected memory. Heroes of such pre-eminent prowess that the like of them have not been born. And now everything has been restored to us under the benign and illustrious auspices of Shrimant (Peshve) owing to the astuteness and valour of Patil Boa. But how was all this achieved! Because we had won we thought it had been an easy matter. If it had been the case of Mohammedans, volumes of histories would have been written about it. Amongst the Mohammedans even the smallest matter is extolled by them to the skies. While amongst us Hindus we are inclined not even to refer to our exploits however magnificent they may be. Indeed results difficult to achieve have been achieved. The Mohammedans think and say that the accursed Hindus have established their supremacy! And really Patil Boa has broken the heads of those who tried to raise them. In fact the unachievable has been achieved. To establish order and reap its benefit like the great kings is still ahead. I am afraid our merits will fail and the work will be spoiled. The achievements are not limited to the acquisition of territory and regaining of our kingdom, but include the preservation of Vedas and Shastras, rehabilitation of religion, protection cows and Brahmins, establishment of suzerainty and the diffusion of our fame and victory. To keep all this intact depends on you and Patil Boa. If there is difference amongst you the enemy is bound to grow strong. Now my misgivings are at rest. It was really splendid ! Very excellent! The enemies are besetting us on all sides. I was very uneasy. Your letter has been a relief to me ( 1793 A. D. ). http://hindusarise.com/<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> History of the Maratha nation - Guest - 01-03-2007 <!--QuoteBegin-Hauma Hamiddha+Dec 27 2006, 01:03 PM-->QUOTE(Hauma Hamiddha @ Dec 27 2006, 01:03 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->This remarkable issue was ..... [right][snapback]62478[/snapback][/right] <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> Hauma, I recently read that Shahaji had written a letter to Ali Adil Shah II (of Bijapur) in 1656. In the middle of this letter complaining of the terms of his service, he says "I have served several kings, but always maintained my self respect. We are rajputs" (As quoted in Stewart Gordon: Page 88: The Marathas 1600-1818 who in turn quotes Ithihas Manjari by D.V. Apte, Poona 1923 ) Does anyone know what is Apte's source? -Digvijay History of the Maratha nation - Guest - 02-20-2007 Depending upon one version, Chhatrapati Shivaji Raje was born on today's date in year 1630. (Feb 19, 1630). What do our experts opine? History of the Maratha nation - Hauma Hamiddha - 02-20-2007 <!--QuoteBegin-digvijay+Jan 3 2007, 08:44 AM-->QUOTE(digvijay @ Jan 3 2007, 08:44 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--> I recently read that Shahaji had written a letter to Ali Adil Shah II (of Bijapur) in 1656. In the middle of this letter complaining of the terms of his service, he says "I have served several kings, but always maintained my self respect. We are rajputs" <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> Apte and Balkrishna point to a letter preserved apparently the archives of Deccan College in Pune. I have not personally examined this letter to confirm the above, but other reliable sources like the Ghorpade of Mudol having seen it mention that Shahji had called himself a Rajput. History of the Maratha nation - Hauma Hamiddha - 02-20-2007 <!--QuoteBegin-Bodhi+Feb 19 2007, 09:15 PM-->QUOTE(Bodhi @ Feb 19 2007, 09:15 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Depending upon one version, Chhatrapati Shivaji Raje was born on today's date in year 1630. (Feb 19, 1630). What do our experts opine? [right][snapback]64693[/snapback][/right] <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> Bodhi- Tilka has made a remarkable study on this point. The different Maharatti sources give different dates for his birth. If I ever get some time I will try to write on that. Below is a cut and paste of Tilak's proposed 4 most likely dates: 1. Shaka 1549, Prabhava, Vaishakha Shudha 2, Saturday (7th April 1627) 2. Shaka 1549, Prabhava, Vaishakha Shudha 5, Tuesday (10th April 1627) 3. Shaka 1548, Kshaya, Vaishakha 2, Monday (17th April 1626) 4. Shaka 1548, Kshaya, Vaishakha Shudha 5, Thursday (20th April 1626) The year prabhava and kShaya are in the 60 year Jupiter cycle (ShaShaThi samvatsara) that currently has gone out of phase between North and South India. History of the Maratha nation - Guest - 02-20-2007 <!--QuoteBegin-Hauma Hamiddha+Feb 19 2007, 11:42 PM-->QUOTE(Hauma Hamiddha @ Feb 19 2007, 11:42 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->The year prabhava and kShaya are in the 60 year Jupiter cycle (ShaShaThi samvatsara) that currently has gone out of phase between North and South India. [right][snapback]64703[/snapback][/right] <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> Thanks! Can you please elaborate more on ShaShaThi Samvatsar, prabhava, and kShaya -when you get a chance? History of the Maratha nation - Guest - 06-21-2007 An excerpt from Govind Sakharam Sardesai's monumental work "A New History of Marathas, Vol II - 1707-1772". This is about Peshwa Madhavrao whom considering the circumstances that he faced and the way he dealt with them should be probably the best of all Peshwas or at least as good as Bajirao I. At times it may seem very eulogic, but if you read the previous chapters on Madhavrao's reign in this book you can but agree with what Mr Sardesai says. "CHAPTER XXVI TRAGIC END {1772} 1 The Peshvsa's incurable malady. 4 The wife and the mother. 2 His last will. 5 Character of the Peshwa. 3 Peaceful death. 6 Foreign eulogy. 7 Anecdotes. 1. The Peshwa's incurable malady.âWhat a tremendous strain must have been caused by the momentous events described above on the body and the mind of a boy called upon at the age of sixteen to manage the concerns of a far flung Empire in its hour of the greatest peril. A tall lean but muscular figure, fair and commanding in appearance, soon lost all its original vigour, particularly when it was discovered that an insidious wasting disease had housed itself in his frame unnoticed. For some time the patient fought the malady with his inborn courage and continued his usual hard work. Towards the end of 1770 he proceeded from Poona bent on completing his work in the Karnatak, but he so quickly broke down on the way, that he had to return from Miraj and yield himself to proper treatment. Thus his last two years were spent in seek ing health, now at Katore on the Godavari, then at Sidhtek, and lastly at Theur in the vicinity of Poona. There was then no scientific treatment of tuberculosis, a disease called by the ancients Raj-Yakshma or the prince of diseases. In his case it was of the intestinal variety as can be ascertained from the unbearable pain in the stomach, which often made the Peshwa cry out for a dagger to open his bowels with. The lungs and the chest were intact. The Peshwa did not take long to realise that his end was approaching, but happily lived long enough to learn that splendid victories in the north had crowned his all too short a career and that Haidar Naik in the south had also been humbled though not crushed in the summer of 1772. The Mughal Emperor had again come under Maratha protection early in that year and been restored to his seat at Delhi, in opposition to the British plans, thereby exhibiting to the world that the batle of Panipat had not made a final decision. The various members of the Maratha confederacy had all been completely restored to the Pfeshwa's allegiance, so that it became a legitimate boast of the Maratha nation that obedience and harmony were never more in evidence in the Maratha State than at this period. The Bhosles of Nagpur, the Gaikwads of Baroda, the Ghorpades of Gootty, the Pratinidhi and Babuji Naik were mercilessly corrected. The arch-intriguer Gangoba, Holkar's Diwan, was made an example of; Tukoji Holkar, Ahalyabai, Mahadji Sindia became attached to the Peshwa as never before. The restraint put on the Peshwa's uncle Raghunathrao, checked the factious tendency among others as well. Dada's supporters Chinto Vithal, Sadashiv Ramchandra, Sakharam Hari learnt the lesson of their lives. Even men like Haripant Phadke and Nana Phadnis, the most confidential and trusted secretaries of the Peshwa, stood in the greatest awe of their master.1 The veteran Sakharam Bapu shrank from playing his evil pranks. In the autumn of 1770 when work accumulated with which the Peshwa's failing strength could not cope, he called upon Sakharam Bapu to dispose of the routine work and initiate Narayanrao into the administration. Brahmans were employed at different shrines to recite prayers and solicit divine favour for restoring the Peshwa's health. His mother Gopika-bai suggested certain sanctified rites, which were punctiliously carried out by Nana Phadnis under his own personal supervision. When returning from Miraj to Poona the Peshwa was weighed against gold on the bank of the Krishna; he was also again weighed at Katore on the Godavari and the metal was distributed in charity to the poor. Janoji Bhosle who had recently made his submission expressed great concern on account of the Peshwa's ailment ; he specially came to Poona during 1. G'angadhar Tatya had to suffer confinement for three years for evading payment of heavy ransom of thirty lacs laid on him for having been the main instigator of Raghunathrao's rebellion. He was severely caned in open Darbar, a treatment unbecoming for the head of a state in the opinion of some, but which doubtless served to strike terror into every heart. the summer of 1772, personally to plead with him to soften the rigour of his uncle's confinement, lest, as was then believed, the prisoner should practise evil rites for hampering the Peshwa's recovery.- While the Peshwa was seriously laid up at Poona, his mother too became very ill at Nasik and desired to proceed to Benares to end her life at that holy place. But the lady was persuaded to abandon her intention, as she was unable to bear the strain. The Peshwa wished to meet her ; she could not come to Poona, nor could the Peshwa be taken to Nasik in his precarious state of health.; Narayanrao used to be in close attendance upon the Peshwa, but the latter was not entirely satisfied with the way he behaved. This boy was fanciful, easily excitable, and inclined to disregard elderly folks and advisers. It is recorded in a paper dated 28th August 1771 that the Peshwa administered some strong advice to Narayanrao, on various matters. The severity of the admonition discloses the Peshwa's extreme dissatisfaction with the young lad's character. The Peshwa was placed under expert treatment. Of the physicians who treated the patient in his last days at least three names are available. One was Baba Vaidya of Poona ; there was a European physician probably from Goa; and there was one north Indian celebrity named Ganga Vishnu hailing from Jaipur who treated the Peshwa for some two years. 2. The last will.âAfter the summer months of 1772, the Peshwa visibly grewr worse and all hopes of recovery began to be given up. He strongly desired to end his life in the presence of his family deity Ganesh, and was therefore removed to the famous shrine at Theur where permission was granted to all and sundry to come and see him. Here he sent for his uncle Raghunathrao along with Narayanrao and the principal officers, and in their presence executed what has been called his last will, which is dated 30th September 1772, and which thus runs in substance :â 1. "All my debts should be paid even by using, if neces- 2. Janoji died at Tulzapur immediately after on 16th May 1772. 3. It is recorded that Gopikabai saw him at Poona for a few days in April 1771. dared to approach him. Sakharam Bapu and Nana Phadnis kept him constant company during his last days, and were enjoined to conduct the affairs of the State after him, making Narayanrao the Peshwa. In face of the cruel untimely death which he knew was fast approaching, with scarcely the strength to move his limbs in bed, he uttered not a single sigh of disappointment or sorrow. The thought that he had fulfilled his life's task cheered him to the last. He invited Ramshastri to his presence as also the other worthies of his court and spoke parting words to each and all. To the last moment he retained his senses, and expired at 8'clock in the morning of Wednesday Kartik Krishna 8th, 18th November 1772. 4. The wife and the mother.âThe Peshwa's wife Ramabai showed equal fortitude by immolating herself on the funeral pyre of her husband. She walked in procession in the midst of funeral music and the beating of drums for the distance of about half a mile from the temple to the river, where the cremation was to take place. Reaching the burning ghat at the edge of the water, she stood boldly and cheerfully on the holy stone (Dharma-shila] in front of her husband's lifeless form, gave away in charity all the ornaments she was wearing, entrusted Narayanrao to the care of Dada Saheb, and with a serene countenance gave her blessings to all the assemblage. A small stone memorial erected in her pious memory stands today to remind the curious visitor of the blessed life of this loving pair, who departed in close company never to be parted in after life, Rama and Madhav, as the people believed, the very incarnation of Lord Krishna and his consort Lakshmi. Ramabai, daughter of Ramchandra Ballal Joshi of Miraj, was married on 9th December 1753 when she was six or seven years old and departed life at the age of twenty-six. She was handsome, strong and healthy. She bore her husband no children. She was a devoted wife always in awe of her husband and never interfered in concerns outside the palace. She often visited the holy places in the Deccan. Madhavrao's mother Gopikabai was also a typical woman, strong-willed, shrewd and experienced from having watched the rising course of the Maratha State since the days of her renowned father-in-law. Madhavrao, it would seem, had taken more alter his mother than his father. During the first year or two of her son's Peshwaship she directed the affairs of State and offered advice on questions of moment. But when she came to realize that her interference bred a factious spirit at the court, she retired completely from Poona and took up her permanent residence at Gangapur near Nasik on the Godavaii. Here she passed all her remaining life in prayer and worship till her death in 1788. She had an annuity of Rs. 12,000 assigned for her expenses. Though the mother and the son did not often meet, they exchanged frequent and regular correspondence which breathes intense affection and mutual regard. Madhavrao reported to his mother mostly in his own hand in Balbodh script every little affair of importance, not only of personal health but also those of a political character, battles, treaties, behaviour of officers and relatives. He freely sought her advice on critical occasions but never accepted it against his own judgment. Once she recommended that transit duties be remitted in the district of Nasik, as there was famine and grain scarcity. But the Peshwa did not accept the recommendation, urging that if he allowed remittance in one district, he wrould have to do the same in all others. Gopikabai was at least ten years older than Raghunathrao, who feared and respected her outwardly, although she spurned him for his wicked and selfish ways. 5. Character of the Peshwa.âO( all the Peshwas Madhavrao stands by common consent as the greatest in point of character. He possessed all those qualities which a good ruler ought to have, thorough honesty, love of impartial justice, quick despatch, concern for the welfare of the people committed to his charge, and an independent judgment, formed after full enquiry, upon wrhich he acted without fear or favour. If one takes into account that he was only sixteen when called upon to manage the complex affairs of a widely spread Empire, and that within some eleven years, of which many were wasted in an unnecessary civil war and in fighting a consuming dis ease, he carried to completion the main objects of his three eminent predecessors, then only can one form a correct estimate of his powers. Indeed, he stands as an outstanding figure in Maratha history and as a brilliant ornament to his nation. He possessed the statesmanship of Balaji Vishvanath, a valour second only to that of Bajirao, and a sternness which his fathervlacked. He wiped off the disgrace which the Maratha nation had suffered on account of the disaster at Panipat, and restored the Maratha fortunes to such a glory that it is rightly claimed that the premature death of this young Peshwa was a greater blow to the Maratha State than the disaster of Panipat. The great historian Grant Duff has justly emphazised the same view by saying, that "the plains of Panipat were not more fatal to the Maratha Empire than the early end of this excellent prince." When the battle of Panipat carried away the three leading members of the Peshwa's house, Bhau Saheb, Vishvasrao, and Nana Saheb soon after the first two, it was commonly believed that the Maratha State would sopn collapse. But Madhavrao in a short time managed to raise a new generation of capable leaders to take the place of those that had perished, and he raised the State to such a height of glory that if luckily he had been spared a few years more, there was every chance of the dream of a Maratha Empire for India conceived and fostered by Shivaji, Bajirao and others, coming true. Maratha supremacy never meant extinction of the Muslim or other nationalities. It only meant that supreme political power would rest with the Marathas. The Marathas claimed religious freedom for themselves and for all those who inhabited this vast continent. They did not suppress the Mughal Emperor of Delhi : they helped him to regain his lost throne and to maintain his rights and authority. They only claimed to guide his political counsels. But the preeminent service of Madhavrao consisted not so much in his achievements and conquests, either in the south or in the north, as in the general improvement of the moral tone of the Maratha administration to which hardly any of his predecessors had attended. Corruption was severely rooted out, the revenue system was so reformed as to conduce to the welfare and prosperity of the people. The judiciary began to function efficiently under the management of the eminent judge Ram Shastri. Complaints came to be speedily noticed and wrong-doers rightly punished. Many vexatious taxes and imposts were removed. Definite rules and conditions of service were framed and promulgated for the jagirdars and their military equipment.4 The whole administrative staff of officials came to be purged of various evil practices that had become rampant. The system of Veth or exaction of forced labour from lower classes, was entirely abolished, and every kind of service came to be paid for in cash. The very name of this Peshwa came to be held in awe by the rulers and the ruled in and out of the Maratha State. Agencies were employed to gather secret news by which reports of evil practices reached him, so that even his immediate servants used to be in great fear of the Peshwa's punishment. Quite a new generation of honest and efficient officials, clerks, accountants, super -visers, revenue collectors, military suppliers, came to be reared up. Leaders and commanders of military corps shed their proverbial lethargy and became alert and obedient. The want of efficient artillery was keenly observed by this Peshwa, and he organized a special branch for the manufacture of fire-arms and ammunition. Indeed, this was one of the most important subjects which the Peshwa personally supervised and continuously toiled to improve. Madhavrao was not only an administrator but by experience quickly became an efficient commander of large armies as well. He often exhibited unexampled valour and skill in strategy. He was certainly an autocrat of the type that was then common all over the world, but he was benevolent and selfless like his contemporaries in Europe. He devoted his whole life to the service of his people. The mere mention of a few outstanding names among his immediate and trustworthy subordinates, is enough to convince us how this Peshwa reared up a new race of men and purified the corrupt system of administration, raising it to a high level. Ram Shastri, Govind Shivram Tatya, Naro Appaji, Mahadaji Ballal Guruji, Trimbakrao Pethe, Gopalrao Patwardhan, Ram-chandra Ganesh, Visaji Krishna, Nana Phadnis and his cousin Moroba, Haripant Phadke and his brothers, are some of the celebrities of Madhavrao's creation. These names are to this day remembered as almost household words in Maharashtra, it is these men that worked to preserve the Maratha State in the chaotic situation which overtook it after this Peshwa's death. There is also a number of names of the opposite type who were severely dealt with and ultimately reclaimed. The Pratinidhis, Janoji Bhosle and his brothers and his minister Dewajipant, Chinto Vithal, the Chandrachud family, Babuji Naik, Murarrao Ghorpade, Naro Shankar, Sadashiv Ram-chandra, all these learnt a new and salutary lesson. Ram Shastri was to Madhavrao more than what Ramdas was to Shivaji. He was a real guru and the final referee in all matters of a mundane nature, even outside his department of justice. He along with Govindpant Tatya and Guruji formed a trio which was respected and feared by high and low alike for their pure and upright character. Most of the sardars, Mahadji Sindia, Tukoji Holkar, Ahalyabai, Damaji Gaikwad and his sons, the large family of the Patwrardhans, these and others became devoted and obedient servants of the Maratha State. The net revenue of that State at the time of this Peshwas death has been variously calculated and may be reliably put down at about ten crores of rupees annually in the coin of those days. The trials and hardships to which Madhavrao was exposed since the very start of his short career, compelled him to de tect the most vulnerable spot in the Maratha body politic. The Maratha State since Shahu's days had developed not as a strong unitary Government but as a confederation of states loosely held together under the central authority. In this confederacy the rights, duties and responsibilities of the feudatories had never been clearly defined or rigidly enforced. Madhavrao inherited this unfortunate legacy and found to his cost that the jagirdars either openly defied the central authority or joined the enemies of the State. With the help of competent confidential advisers he gradually succeeded in checking the evil by punishing the wrongdoers and creating solidarity and a workable unity in the Government. This significant achievement becomes plain not only in his wars and administrative measures, but even in the jealousy, which his growing power excited in the minds of the British. On 10th March 1771 the Madras Council wrote,â" From the present conduct of the Marathas both in the north and in the south and from the genius, spirit and ambition of Madhavrao we are inclined to suspect that their designs are not confined to the mere collection of Chauth, but extend to the subjugation of the whole peninsula."-' 6. Foreign eulogy.âSir Richard Temple, by no Cleans an admirer of things eastern, records the following eloquent testimony about the character of this Peshwa. 4t In some of the characters just depicted there has been found virtue of the secondary type, energy, courage, enthu siasm, patriotism and the like ; buC in none of them is to be .seen virtue of the purer, nobler, loftier quality. In Madhavrao there is virtue of the best stamp. In trying moments he evinced not only presence of mind but also a proud consciousness that by him an example should be set to all around. He chose ministers with discrimination, some of whom justified his choice by their subsequent achievements. He enforced strictness in the service of the state and strove to procure honesty so far as that was procurable in a corrupt age. If an instance occurred of bad faith in high places, he would denounce it with a frankness surprising to those who lived in evil times. Though obliged to keep the uncle out of positions which afforded opportunities of doing harm, yet he showed the utmost consideration towards his relative. When two of his officers during a siege wanted to fight a duel over a quarrel, he told them, instead to scale the deadly breach, promising to decree in favour of the disputant who should first plant the national flag upon the rampart. His care extended to the fiscal, the judicial, and the general departments. All men in his day knew that the head of the state was personally master of the work, was the friend of the oppressed and the foe of the oppressor, and was choosing agents who would carry out his beneficent orders. His thoughtfulness and considerateness were untiring and were often shown in a signal or graceful manner. For instance, he conferred benefits upon the descendants of the cavalry leader Santaji Ghorpade, who had been assassinated by Shivaji's son and successor, in order that such tardy justice as might be possible after the lapse of a generation, should be done. All the while he was engaged in war and politics. He had to hold his own against the Nizam of the Deccan ; to drive back Hydar All of Mysore, to retrieve that disaster at Panipat which had grieved his father to death. While greatly superior to his predecessors as a civil ruler, he was not inferior to them as a warlike commander. His lieutenants were just retrieving the Panipat disaster, when his own health, always delicate, gave way. Anticipating death, he adjured his uncle to protect the next Peshwa, who would be a boy to avert disunion from the reigning family and save the empire from distraction. What reply he received we know not: at all events he was allowed to die in hope ; we shall soon see how cruelly the hope was belied. True to the habits of his race, he retired to a rural village not far from Poona, and died quietly in the 28th year of his age ; and that village is to this day regarded by the Marathas as one of the most classic spots in their historic land. His childless widow, to whom he was devotedly attached, burnt herseli with his corpse, to satisfy her grief as well as to obey the behests of her religion. This is an instance of those who arc virtuous in their joint life and to whom death brings no separation. That Madhavrao, a Hindu Prince, should have done so-much in so brief a life as his, under such disadvantages and despite such temptations that, before being cut off, in the heyday of his career, he should have evinced such capacity as this, not only in affairs susceptible of management by youthful genius, but also in matters ordinarily demanding the experience of ripe years, is truly astonishing. Indeed, he is for ever to be revered as the model prince, ' the flos regum' and as one of the finest characters that the Hindu nationality has ever produced."*' Writes Kincaid, ik Threatened both by domestic and foreign enemies, Madhavrao triumphed signally over all. Yet his triumph had brought him no rest- Victorious over his foes he-had spent his years in tireless labour to better the condition of his people. Every department was quickened by his supervision, his industry and his example. His secret intelligence was faultless ; and no matter how remote the officer guilty of acts of tyranny, he rarely escaped punishment. The Peshwa's armies went well-equipped on service for the entire military organization was under his direct control. Quick to anger, he was no less quick to forgive. And the only fault that the harshest critic can find in this admirable ruler is, that he shortened a life precious to his people by his arduous and unceasing toil." 7. Anecdotes.âMaharashtra still loves to repeat a number of anecdotes and reminiscences illustrating the high moral character of this Peshwa, which are doubtless substantially true and give an accurate picture of his personality. When Madhavrao like a pious Brahman, at first began to devote much of his time to prayer and ritual, Ram Shastri sternly rebuked him for neglecting his secular duties and advised him to repair to Benares to spend his life there, if he were inclined to be so sanctimonious. The Peshwa quietly and thankfully took the hint and dropped his priestly role. He doubtless possessed an irritable temper, but that only disclosed his aversion for injustice and wrong and his impatience to correct blemishes. On that account he soon came to be feared arid obeyed. When he found that death was near, he set about destroying the accumulated store of secret state papers, referring to the low intrigues of his officials and servants. Sakharam Bapu learning what the Peshwa was doing, approached him and humbly remonstrated against this procedure. The Peshwa unable to move from his bed, asked Bapu to hand him a certain packet from the adjoining chest. When Bapu brought the bundle out, the Peshwa asked him to open it, read the contents and tell him whether he should destroy or keep it. To his amazement Bapu discovered that the papers in that bundle referred to his own secret intrigues and plots of a criminal nature deserving punishment. The Peshwa had in his possession those proofs of Bapu's guilt, but had never let him know what accusations had reached him through various channels. Madhavrao's attention to details excites our admiration. He inquires about the construction of unauthorized buildings in Poona. He scrutinizes the lists showing the number and pay of his attendants. From the Karnatak he inquires how Nana Phadnis was behaving in Poona, like a master or a servant.7 He wishes to be informed of the arrangements for supplying fodder to the cattle attached from Babuji Naik's establishment at Baramati. His daily accounts contain references to very small items of expenditure such as Rs. 1-8 for lamp oil supplied to clerks. He personally chooses dresses and presents to be given to Nizam Ali and his suite or to an envoy from Goa or to Ghazi-ud-din. He minutely examines cases of embezzlement. There used to be much corruption among inspecting officers sent out to examine the military equipment of the jagirdars and sardars, the number and quality of their men and horses, their saddles and arms and accoutrements. The inspectors when bribed certified that there were no deficiencies. When complaints were received, the Peshwa sent his own trusted agents such as Guruji, Nana Phadnis, Naro Appaji to detect irauds. When these special agents arrived for inspection, the whole official staff was in consternation and quaked for the heavy punishments that awaited them. It would thus appear that this Peshwa's rule was far above that of his contemporaries in rooting out official corruption and venality. The Peshwa would not allow the ryots to be molested on any account. He paid compensation to them when they suffered losses from the march of troops. During his tours he personally inquired into the people's grievances and removed the iniquities that he noticed. Remission of revenue was granted when there were political disturbances or failure of rain. A Kotwal's duties and the rules which should guide him in his management of the towns, are found clearly set down in various documents issued by the Peshwa, and now reproduced in the Peshwa's Diaries. This Peshwa's death ushers in a new phase in Maratha history which will form the subject of my concluding volume." End of excerpt What I find truly great about Madhavrao may be summarised in the following points 1. Maturity and immense sense of responsibility displayed at a very tender age of 16. I know at the age of 16 my father had to get behind me to study for my exams and I'd no clue of my future. Here is a chap who has lost his father, the empire is bankrupt due to a debilitating war, its prestige shattered due to an embarassing loss, its principal warlords and statesmen lost to war in one day and it is all rebuilt brick by brick by a 16 year old in the face of one of the most turbulent times in Indian history, with neighbors like the vily Nizam, the ambitious Hyder Ali, and the British on ascendant, not to mention the intrigues of his own uncle. No wonder Madhavrao was made of a different stuff altogether for exactly 10 years later his brother Narayanrao showed himself thoroughly incapable of handling far less difficult circumstances than what his elder brother had faced 2. That he not only coped and survived the difficult times but also managed to effect some major changes in some neglected areas of administration. Revamping the administrative machinery, reducing corruption, putting in place a system of strict checks and balances 3. His sense of justice, his upright character 4. As a manager I admire his ability to bring things under his control and influence every matter that affects him. He had such energy and zeal, such clarity of thought at such young age, and he was able to get things done 5. He managed to get a strong set of people around him who could be trusted and relied upon and he managed to keep a check and even make good use of troublemakers. He very ably managed people far senior to him in age. He had a clear vision and could look ahead than others; he could see the British as a grave threat to Marathas and always distrusted them. 6. Lastly and more importantly he achieved all this while always battling against a debilitating illness which constantly sapped whatever energy he had. But inspite of this he managed to leave behind a far stronger empire than what he inherited. If only he had lived a few more years, if only.......... Probably Sardesai is right when he says that Panipat was a far lesser loss than the early death of Madhavrao History of the Maratha nation - Bodhi - 01-05-2009 One should study the behaviour of the kAyastha and khattrI ministers of the later marahaTTA-s like shinde-s and holkars. I think these individuals, although efficient in administration but secularized/de-nationalized after centuries of dhimmitude in service of their Moslem rulers, might have played their part in eventual decline of marahaTTA-s. Anyone aware of any analysis of this aspect? History of the Maratha nation - Bodhi - 11-25-2009 superstar hindutva thinker writes: <!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->As the aging Thackeray ponders his loss of political splendour, he would do well to enlarge his currently puny canvass to the mega dimensions of the original Maratha sardeshmukh. Shivaji strove consciously for power as an instrument for the resurrection of dharma (righteousness), and termed his quest as âHindavi Swarajya,â a word with geographical and spiritual-cultural connotations. When in his teens in 1645 CE, he began administering his father's estate under a personalized seal of authority in Sanskrit, a hint that he envisaged independence and adhered to the Hindu tradition. A 1646 CE letter to Dadaji Naras Prabhu refers to an oath that Shivaji, Prabhu, and others took in the presence of the deity at Rayareshwar, to establish âHindavi Swarajya.â The Peshwa, in contrast, accepted the Persian script under the influence of a Muslim courtesan, and narrow-mindedly refused to convert her to Hindu dharma despite her keenness to embrace the faith. As a result, the Marathas bowed to the Mughal emperor when they reached Delhi and missed a historic opportunity to re-establish Hindu rule; a classic case of muscle without mind, power without political sense! The rest is history. http://vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayArticle.aspx?id=948 <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> where is she going I wonder, and what depths our so-called Hindu journalists have reached in their utter ignorance. <!--emo&:angry:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/mad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='mad.gif' /><!--endemo--> History of the Maratha nation - Bodhi - 11-27-2009 <b>bAjIrAva the ânarrow mindedâ?</b> It is because we hold shrImatI sandhyA jaina in high esteem as a hindU-minded journalist with an influencial reach and a tremendous potential, that we read with shock and disappointment the following lines coming from her pen: ââ¦in his teens in 1645 CE, he (shivAjI) began administering his fatherâs estate under a personalized seal of authority in Sanskrit, a hint that he envisaged independence and adhered to the Hindu tradition⦠The Peshwa, in contrast, accepted the Persian script under the influence of a Muslim courtesan, and narrow-mindedly refused to convert her to Hindu dharma despite her keenness to embrace the faith. As a result, the Marathas bowed to the Mughal emperor when they reached Delhi and missed a historic opportunity to re-establish Hindu rule; a classic case of muscle without mind, power without political sense! The rest is history.â (link) Above is of course inaccurate as most readers would already know, but becomes difficult for us to ignore because it disrespectfully targets our favourite hero the first bAjIrAva, the ablest disciple of shivAjI. Let us tackle the errors part by part, starting with the thing about Persian. In context of the contemporary times, usage of Persian was a lesser evil, since it was the prevailing language of diplomacy and politics, and was used by most Hindu kings in their correspondences, before, during and after the times of cHatrapati and peshavA, up until English language elbowed out pArasIka tongue in status, eventually replacing it. Do we need to remind how gobinda siMha wrote zafarnAmah in Persian, and how raNajIta siMha had coinage and titles issued in Persian, and how most of the ambar archive is full of that language? Only those courts which had managed to keep themselves totally aloof were able to continue with the native languages. Even within shivAjIâs court, Persian titles and terms gave way to saMskR^ita ones very late in his regime. sabhAsada records that it was not until his rAjyAbhiSheka ceremony that the âSanskrit titles were ordered to be used in future to designate their offices, and the Persian titles hitherto current were abolished.â Thus it was not until as late as cHatrapatiâs coronation that âpeshavAâ became mukhya-pradhAna, âmajUmadArâ became AmAtya, âwaqiyA-navIsâ mantrI, âshurU-navIsâ sachiva, âdabIrâ sumanta, and âsar-i-naubatâ senApati. This too, of course under the guidance of the early paNDita-pradhAna-s, the predecessors of brilliant bAjIrAva. It was also by the guidance of his far-sighted peshavA-s that cHatrapati commissioned a handbook of working saMskR^ita too for the new-founded hindU state. A whole chest of letters written by (the clerks of) shivAjI during the early days are in Persian. For instance, his famed letter sent for maharaja jayasiMha kacHavAhA during the famous siege, published by bAbU jagannAtha dAsa of vArANasI, speaks about establishing a Hindu collaboration to root out the Islamic tyranny: âGreat Monarch mahArAjA jaisiMha, you are a valiant kShatriya, why do you use your strength to further the power of the dynasty of bAbUr? Why shed the costly Hindu blood to make the red-faced musalmAns victorious? ⦠If you had come to conquer me, you would find my head humbly at the path you tread, but you come as a deputy of the tyrant, and I can not decide how I behave towards you⦠If you fight in championing our Hindu Religion, you shall find me your comrade in arms⦠Being so brave and valiant, it behoves you as a Great Hindu General to lead our joint armies against Emperor instead, and indeed let us go together and conquer that city of dillI, shed our blood instead in preserving the ancient religion which we and our ancestors have followedâ¦â. The above letter of shivAjI is, not in maharaTTI saMskR^ita or hindI, but in Persian, so are several others among shivAjIâs letters and orders. One must bear the contemporary situation in mind, before blaming bAjIrAva of âin contrast, accepting the Persian script under the influence of a Muslim courtesanâ. In fact peshavA-s, and in particular the rare visionary the original bAjIrAva along with his son, did the most meaningful service than anyone else since the days of vijayanagara empire, in reviving the devabhAShA. This is acknowledged even by the saMskR^ita-basher like Sheldon Pollock in his âThe Death of Sanskritâ, where he quoted a stanza of a gujarAtI poet who âsensed that some important transformation had occurred at the beginning of the second millennium, which made the great literary courts of the age, such as Bhojaâs, the stuff of legend (which last things often become); that the cultivation of Sanskrit by eighteenth-century rulers like the Peshwas of Maharashtra was too little too late; that the Sanskrit cultural order of his own time was sheer nostalgic ceremony.â Indeed, after kAshI it was pUnA which had emerged as the greatest center of saMskR^ita revival in the eighteenth century, under lavish patronage of the peshavA. A flourishing saMskR^ita university was established here by him, and a network of smaller schools, or Tol as they were called, encouraged throughout the empire, to educate the people in the devabhAShA. Many scholars were patronized here, producing several poetries and commentaries, as much as the political situation could afford. mahAdeva govinda rANaDe writes in his âIntroduction to the Peishwaâs Diariesâ: âReference has already been made to the Dakshina grants paid to Shastris, Pundits and Vaidiks. This Dakshina was instituted in the first instance by the Senapati Khanderao Dabhade, and when, on the death of that officer, his resources were curtailed, the charity was taken over by the State, into its own hands. Disbursements increased from year to year, till they rose to Rs. 60, 000 in Nana Fadnavisâ time. These Dakshina grants redeemed to a certain extent the reprehensible extravagance of Bajiraoâs charities (refering to the son, not father). Learned Sanskrit scholars from all parts of India â from Bengal, Mithila or Behar and Benares, as also from tho South, the Telangan, Dravida and the Karnatic â flocked to Poona, and were honoured with distinctions and rewards, securing to them position throughout the country which they highly appreciated.â Earlier this year we had accidentally run into a researcher from yavanadesha, who was doing some research about Greeks living in India in the Eighteenth century. He informed that peshavA had probably contracted a couple of Greeks from vArANasI, to help his pUnA scholars translate some of the Greek Classics of Homer into saMskR^ita. We can not say how true it is, but such impression does reflect on the services of peshavA in reviving saMskR^ita. Now, coming to the âMuslim courtesanâ part, reference here is to mastAnI, whom bAjIrAva ânarrow-mindedly refused to convert to Hindu dharmaâ. This is nothing short of blasphemy against the most genius Hindu Warrior and Strategist we have known since cHatrapati himself. mastAnI was a daughter of a Hindu father (some say of cHatrasAla himself) and a Moslem courtesan, married to bAjIrAv as a upapatnI by cHatrasAla, during bAjIrAvaâs victorious campaign in mAlavA (where he again decisive hammered the Hyderabad Nizam in the classic battle of Bhopal, dashing his ambitions towards North for ever). Incidentally, it is from this victorious campaign that bAjIrAva returned not only with mastAnI, but also with elderly bhUShaNa, who was living his retired life at bundelakhaNDa, who accepted bAjIrAvâs invitation to relate to shAhUjI his reminisces of shivAjI. (The result was a poetry that came to be known as shiva-bAvanI, 52 pada-s dedicated to important milestones of shivAjIâs career; the famed âsivAjI na hoto tau sunnata hota sabakIâ is from this work.) It was not bAjIrAva because of whose ânarrow mindednessâ the re-conversion of mastAnI did not happen, but that of the ultra-orthodox brAhmaNa-s who had even out-casted bAjIrAv himself on accusations of eating meat, drinking wine, smoking tobacco and keeping Moslem wife etc. A son of bAjIrAva through mastAnI, named by bAjIrAv as kR^iShNarAva, was raised privately by him as a brAhmaNa and as per some pUnA traditions, even his thread-ceremony was performed at kasabA gaNapati, but he was not accepted as a Hindu by the more orthodox and was forced to live like a Moslem under the name of shamshIr bahAdur. This seed of bAjIrAv valiantly fought against abdAlI and fell in the battle of pAnIpat at the age of twenty-seven. Orthodoxyâs rejection of bAjIrAva, his status not withstanding, was so strong that even the thread ceremonies and weddings of bAjIrAvaâs legitimate sons were threatened to be boycotted if either bAjIrAv or mastAnI came anywhere near the ceremonies. bAjIrAv indeed did not attend these. bAjIrAvaâs younger brother chimanAjI appA, the hero of vasaI, also never accepted mastAnI, and it is said that he even tried to eliminate her once when bAjIrAv was away leading the final battle of his life, in crushing the Hyderabad Nizam one more time before his untimely death, and was restrained from doing so by none less than shAhU himself. However, in contrast contemporary records indicate that the peshavA-s themselves had quite an open outlook, especially about re-converting hindU-s that had under duress become musalmAna-s. mahAdeva rANADe provides some crucial data from peshavAâs diaries themselves: âln those times of wars and troubles, there were frequent occasions when men had to forsake their ancestral faith under pressure, force, or fraud, and there are four well-attested instances in which the re-admission into their respective castes, both of Brahmins and Marathas, was not merely attempted but successfully effected, with the consent of the caste, and with the permission of the State authorities. A Maratha, named Putaji Bandgar, who had been made a captive by the Moguls, and forcibly converted to Mahomedanism, rejoined the forces of Balaji Vishvanath, on their way back to Delhi, after staying with the Mahomedans for a year, and at his request, his readmission, with the consent of the caste, was sanctioned by Raja Shahu. A Konkanastha Brahmin, surnamed Raste, who had been kept a State prisoner by Haider in his armies, and had been suspected to have conformed to Mahomedan ways of living for his safety, was similarly admitted into caste with the approval of the Brahmins and under sanction from the State. Two Brahmins, one of whom had been induced to become a Gosawee by fraud, and another from a belief that he could be cured of a disease from which he suffered, were readmitted into caste, after repentance and penance. These two cases occurred one at Puutamba, in the Nagar District, and the other at Paithan, in the Nizamâs dominions, and their admission was made with the full concurrence of the Brahmins under the sanction of the authorities.â At one other place, rANAde provides some more important data that tells us about a much broader outlook the peshavA-s displayed in matter of the caste dynamics: âThe right of the Sonars to employ priests of their own caste was upheld against the opposition of the Poona Joshis. The claim made by the Kumbhars (potters) for the bride and the bride-groom to ride on horse-back was upheld against the carpenters and blacksmiths who opposed it. The Kasarâs right to go in processions along the streets, which was opposed by the Lingayats, was similarly upheld. The right of the Parbhus to use Vedic formulas in worship had indeed been questioned in Narayanraoâs time, and they were ordered to use only Puranic forms like the Shudras. This prohibition was, however, resented by the Parbhus, and in Bajirao IIâs time the old order appears to have been cancelled, and the Parbhus were allowed to have the Munja or thread ceremony performed as before. A Konkani Kalal or publican, who had been put out of his caste, because he had given his daughter in marriage to a Gujarathi Kalal, complained to the Peishwa, and order was given to admit him in the caste. In the matter of inter-marriage, Balaji Bajirao set the example by himself marrying the daughter of a Deshastha Sowkar, named Wakhare, in 1760.â So much for the ânarrow mindedâ, let us now come to the final and the most important mistake: âas a result, the Marathas bowed to the Mughal emperor when they reached Delhi and missed a historic opportunity to re-establish Hindu ruleâ. The blame is of course entirely misplaced, indeed a closer analysis will show that bAjIrAvâs energies were continuously driven towards striking down the mughal seat in dillI, and he was restrained from completely taking them out because of a bigger strategy and by shAhUjIâs command. One must read the desperate letters exchanged between him, the maharaTTA generals and envoyes in dillI court, at the time of the invasion by nAdirshAh from Persia. In one letter there is a clear reference of waiting for the âmost perfect timeâ for âeradicating the moghal seat and placing the crown of the Emperor on the rANA of mevADaâ (Refer to Vol II of A New History of Marathas by G S Sardesai). shAhUjI felt, probably correctly, that this would be a misadventure, because maharaTTA power was spread too thin for any such move and he issued a clear policy statement to this effect to his officers. One must remember what even bhUShaNa says about bAjIrAva, at one place he calls bAjI a âbAjaâ (hunt-hawk) who is eager to thrash the partridges of dillI but is obedient to his hunter-master of satArA. But this encircling dillI, but not altogether taking out the puppet moghals, was a part of greater strategy as well as the currents of history. First, there had been ill-ominous precedents of the unfortunate fate when hindU-s tried taking dillI openly: the sad case of short-lived enterprises of khusarU in fourteenth century and of himU in sixteenth, and bAjI would have hesitated to repeat that course in the Eighteenth. Contrary to this jinxed option however, there was a more successful alternative model on the other hand, provided by the hindU history. How shivAjIâs father had once played a similar game succesfully with Adila nizAma shAha, whom he had protected as a puppet against jahAngIr, could have been more fresh in the memories of shAhU and bAjIrAv. Didnât powerful grandfather of mahArANA pratApa, saMgrAma simha follow a similar approach in his own time to encircle dillI, by reducing its moslem occupant to a protectee and focusing instead on taking out the more potent jehAdI-s? Therefore a more wise policy is what bAjIrAv and shAhU must have decided to follow, with following factors driving their strategy decision: a) The center of gravity of jehAd had already shifted within moslem sphere, away from moghal imperial camp and towards independent moslem upstarts in va~Nga, hyderAbad and awadha, besides the rise of mercenaries like Afcrican Blacks and ruhillA-s etc. It was apparent that moghals had become toothless, and nothing was to be gained in practical terms by trying to eliminate the moghals, whereas there were several benefits of allowing them a status of a declared protectorate and go after the more potent jehAdI-s. b) North Indian Hindus, especially rAjapUta-s, were still not ready to weild a common front, much less submit to a maharaTTA-s federal arrangement. sikh, jATa, and gorakhA were yet to become prominent on the radar. c) It was therefore felt, quite correctly, that the policy has to be two fold: one, somehow not letting the jehAdI-s to unite under a common banner and join a common front. two: keeping rAjapUta-s in friendly relations and give them any reason to be alarmed. Both the ends were quite well served by positing of being a friend and protector of the dillI crown for the time rather than a predator threatening the replacement of moghal suzerainty over rAjapUtAnA by the maharaTTA one. Likewise, it disallowed a cry of unity under moghal banner within ghAzI aspirants, which was tested in the battle of bhopAla, where none came to the rescue of nizAm when bAjIrAv curtailed his feathers in North. On this point, one should observe that the East India Company also imitated quite exactly the same strategy as bAjIrAva several decades after him, and with a complete success. Clive and Cornwallis imitated him in great detail, including posing to be a Hindu Saviour and protector of moghal crown, and friend of rAjapUta-s and so on, while they took out the more potent forces one by one, including the maharaTTA-s themselves! d) Militarily too, bAjIrAva was confident of great mobility of maharaTTA cavalry, pioneered by him in now moving and fighting in open fields, long distances away from the base, and fashioned probably after taking cues on this point from changIz khAn! (read the eye-opening thriller on this subject by the AchArya of manasataraMgiNI). This mobility therefore could allow to quickly reach the theatre of operation over a much larger area and did not depend too much on a very fixed large encampment for maharaTTA forces, which further supported the view of letting dillI remain under moghal puppets, rather than requiring to be directly administered. e) There was an administrative aspect too. Taking of dillI would require quite a lot of administrative machinery and overheads to be invested. shAhU was of the opinion that maharaTTA administration itself required to be more solidified before any such formal expansion has to become effective. This was quite a correct assessment too. Since the days of shivAjI, feudal structures like the jAgIradArI and mansabadArI, the hallmarks of moghal administration, were frowned upon. maharaTTA Generals used to be generally paid employees of state (although not necessarily the soldiers), no fiefs were allowed, no personal grant of lands distributed, no permanent subedArI-s given, no personal forts and fortesses allowed to be constructed. A letter of shivAjI written to his eldest son-in-law clearly reflects this where he declined the appeal of the latter for grant of a jAgIr to him, explaining his well-thought policy in this matter. But this system was probably not too scalable for a larger empire, and therefore we see it began to be slightly modified since bAjIrAv and shAhU, when a fort or zone was granted near âpermanentlyâ to an officer hereditarily. He himself granted dhArA in MP to the pawAr Generals (dhAra, the old capital of bhojadeva was thought to be rightfully belonging to the pawAra-s, the descendants of the paramAra-s). But much later the vacuum that arose in the maharaTTA core, which later peshavA-s could not fill, saw the federalist system falter before it had properly stabilized, leading to the independence of sindhiyA, holkar, gAyakavADa, bhonsalA-s etc. leading to the total decline of the central authority. But at the time of bAjIrAva, the system was clearly not in place yet and maharaTTA nation could not have afforded to take up the overhead of administering dillI and its vassals, not to mention the effort needed in putting down the revolts it would have incited everywhere. Thus the policy of circling the moghals, reducing them to the point of extinction, slowly letting them get dismantled by themselves, but not outright eliminating them from dillI seat. We hope shrImatI jaina shall correct the inadvertent but grave mistake of having insulted the great Hindu Hero. History of the Maratha nation - Guest - 03-26-2010 came in email.. Quote:27 Year War That Changed Course Of Indian History History of the Maratha nation - Bharatvarsh2 - 04-07-2010 It seems that certain denizens of a well known military forum are in fact worse than jihadis and ghazis for they have managed to place the Marathas on par with a Muslim fanatic like Tipu. An idiot named samay there kept yapping away about the greatness of Tipu and mentioned the Peshwa's and Aurangzeb in the same breath. Another talked about how the Mughals before Aurangzeb supposedly treated Hindus reasonably well. I suppose he never heard of what was done to Guru Arjun Dev or Akbars massacre of 30,000 unarmed Hindus at Chittor or Shah Jahan's demolishment of Hindu temples. If this means being treated well then I wonder what being treated badly would mean in his book. Reading this reminds me of Aurobindo's words about the lack of ability to think among modern Hindus. Truly these andha-s are a disgrace to the blood of our ancestors and far worse than Kasab or any other terrorist for they are stabbing their own heritage in the back. Baji Rao & Shivaji must be rolling around in their graves to see that these are the degenerates for whose freedom they fought. Tipu's great jihadi deeds are documented here for anyone interested: http://voiceofdharma.com/books/tipu/ http://www.sabha.info/history.html History of the Maratha nation - Bharatvarsh2 - 05-07-2010 Quote:The scope of shivAjIââ¬â¢s plan of svarAjya History of the Maratha nation - Chiron - 05-27-2010 Why is the thread called History of maratha "Nation" when marathas themselves chose to call their empire as "Hindavi Swarajya (Indian selfrule) is beyond understanding.. In the words of T.S.Shejwalkar, the biggest failure of Marathas was their inability to convince rest of the people about their nationalistic outlook and philosophy. History of the Maratha nation - ramana - 05-28-2010 if you go to the first post which sets the title, the member doesnt belong to IF anymore. So it should be changed to one you suggest. Quote:In the words of T.S.Shejwalkar, the biggest failure of Marathas was their inability to convince rest of the people about their nationalistic outlook and philosophy. BTW, the comment is very correct. It was the faliure to connect that led to the British colonial period. And even later it made it easy for INC to put Savarkar away. History of the Maratha nation - Bharatvarsh2 - 09-05-2010 Mahadji Sindhia: life and times of a Dharmic Warrior Amidst the fading light the bursts of gunfire and piles of the dead and dying a young man lay dying. Or at least he thought he was dying amidst the wreck of humanity with nearly sixty thousand warriors slain around him. The field of Panipat in early 1761 was stained red with the blood of Marathas and Afghans locked in a fatal and bloody embrace only broken after the last of many charges of Sadashiv Bhau on the numerically stronger enemy. On the fatal battlefield Mahadji Sindhia lay wounded. His brothers were dead in the service of their people and pursuit of the dream of Hindu Padshahi as envisioned by Shivaji the Great. After seven hundred years of endless warfare the rise of the Maratha peoples had decisively tilted the balance of power between the Hindus and Muslims on the Indian subcontinent. Overreaching ambition however led to the disaster at Panipat but from that dark day the wounded and mangled body of Mahadji Sindhia was dragged from the heaps of the slain to freedom. His father Ranoji Sindhia had been one of the cavalry leaders of the all conquering Maratha hero Baji Rao as he subdued most of North India. An early start at the age of 10 in the company of his brothers and father on their yearly forays swiftly displayed his aptitude on the campaign trail and ability to mould with the swift and tireless Maratha army. From the deep South of India to the invasion of Punjab in 1757.Mahadji Sindhia at an early age learnt the modes of warfare of Mughal, Afghan, North Indian and Europeans. He watched the irresistible waves of horsemen humble the once mighty Mughals and destroy the pride of the Pathans. But from the field of Panipat the dreams of empire were laid low to a point where none believed they could rise again. A slow recovery from his wounds led to his elevation to the head of the Sindhia clan and his valour in helping defeat Tipu Sultan exalted his status. The shaky recovery of the Marathas was sealed by their decisive defeat of the Nizam Ali and thoughts of revenge now occupied their minds. The treacherous leaders of the Indian Afghans was Najib Khan who under the tutelage of Ahmed Shah Abdali had dominated the remnants of the Mughal Empire in North India for the decade after the Battle of Panipat. They had been held at bay only by the valour of Suraj Mal leading the clans of Hindu tribesman known as the Jats in the Mathura region and the arms of the Rajput kingdoms in the deserts of Thar. But now a new Maratha army was marching again to North India in 1769 to complete their uncompleted mission and amongst them marched Mahadji Sindhia. After a bitter battle before the gates of the Red Fort of Delhi the Afghans fled leaving the Mughals to face the Marathas alone. Frantic efforts to collect a pan Islamic alliance to defeat the Hindus resulted in a heavy defeat within a short span of time for the Afghans as they were driven from Delhi northwards to Rohilkhand. There following the death of Najinb Khan vengeance caught up with the Afghans as his tomb was torn open in contempt and his bones thrown into a blazing fire. His grandson Ghulam Qadir however escaped. Back in Delhi the Mughal emperor Shah Alam in quivering fear allowed Mahadji Sindhia to become the defacto ruler of the remnants of the Mughal Empire ruled in the name of the Maratha Peshwa. This was a historical moment which sent a ripple of pride throughout the Maratha Empire a culmination of their century old struggle against the Mughals and foreign domination and an apt succession to the vision of the great Emperor Shivaji. It was also a timely reply to the efforts of the last Muhammadan marauder to test the borders of ancient India - the Afghans, as their dreams of an Indian Empire fell into the dust. A new enemy however was hovering on the horizon to dim the tide of successes. As the millennia old struggle seemed to have tipped irretrievably towards the Hindus in the rise of the Maratha Empire , the independence of the Rajputs, the rise of the Jats and Sikhs and Bundela kingdom and the rise of the Ahom peoples of eastern India a new threat was rising The encroachments of European predatory civilisation was steadily overwhelming all indigenous cultures of the world. The regional powers of the erstwhile Mughal Empire was falling one by one to the Hindu resurgence from the end of the 17th Century onwards as the tides of history began turning against them. Modern trained British forces was already on the subcontinent backing the nefarious tactics of the East India Company and following the devastating raids on Bengal by the Maratha cavalry from the 1740ââ¬â¢s onwards the Nawabs of Bengal clung to British protection to save them. The British however continued to pay the yearly tribute from Bengal to the Maratha Empire until the disaster of Panipat. Thereafter the Marathas were locked into a battle for survival and then revival. The intervening decade saw the British establish their stranglehold over Bengal and began the economic rape and devastation of that province. The attacks of the Marathas and Jats on the province of Awadh under led their Nawab to cling to British protection in 1772 and gave them the opportunity to meddle in Indian affairs. Very soon apart from Mysore virtually all the remaining Muslim states made alliances with the Europeans to preserve themselves against their Hindu adversaries. The same year saw the death of the head of the Maratha Empire, Madhav Rao and an ensuing struggle for control in which the British saw the chance to push their feet into India. A large and well equipped British forces began to advance towards Pune, the capital of the Empire to be faced by Mahadji Sindhia. A furious campaign saw the lands before the marching British fired and waves of Marathas cavalry harrying and attacking the British in endless attacks day and night. Eventually desperate with their supplies breaking the British began to retreat to be caught in a pincer movement at Wadgaon and beaten to utter exhaustion. The British force surrendered and signed a treaty of peace with the Marathas in a humiliating loss witnessed by the entire Indian spectrum. The Punic bad faith of the British however allowed them to repudiate the treaty as soon as they could and the war continued for another 7 years. Despite the calling of further troops and resources from across the Empire the British East India Company was eventually unable to continue the struggle and made peace in 1782. The main architect of the war and peace was Mahadji Sindhia whose stature now rose above all others. He immediately set march for Delhi again and swept aside the pretentions of independence that the Mughals had started reasserting. The man of faith and action had now become the most powerful man in India holding the Mughlas, Afghans and British at bay. He swiftly began to match the Maratha cavalry with a formidable Europeanised infantry units and in the north an alliance with the Hindu Jat tribes of Bharatpur. The empire now starched to the Sutlej river in Punjab with virtually all states being directly or indirectly under their control This however led to deep resentment amongst the Muslim princes of India, They had either clung to the British for protection or were fleeing across the land in search of protection. Tens and thousands of leaderless Muslims soldiers were sitting idle after the breakup of their states. The leadership of the Afghans was taken up by Ghulam Qadir and that of the Mughal soldiers Ismail Beg. In 1788 whilst Sindhia was in Rajasthan the two warlords gathered their troops to them and raised the banner of revolt. Swarms of Muhamadan soldiers, to whom the domination of the Hindus was intolerable, gathered to them and very soon vast forces were arrayed against Sindhia in the North of India. Delhi itself was taken by Ismail Beg and Ghulam Qadir as the banner of Jihad was raised to unite the confederates. Sindhia situation was become desperate at the British were also now pressing the frontiers eager to take revenges for their previous humiliations and the spectre of the Panipat campaign began to haunt the Marathas. However with a series of masterful strokes Mahadji combined the waves of Maratha horsemen with the Europeanised Campoo regiments whilst stocking the forts and castles with the sturdy Hindu Jat warriors. The forts of Agra and Mathura were stormed in a series of bloody battles and the fleeing Muslim coalition fled to Delhi for protection. Here Sindhia caught up with them an enforced a siege on the city. Inside the situation was become increasingly desperate. The calls of the faithful to resist the infidel were beginning to fail and the Emperor Shah Alams heart failed him. Infighting erupted between the Mughals and Afghans and in fury the Afghans cut out the eyes of the Emperor and dishonoured his family only being stopped from murdering the entire royal family by Maniyar Singh a Rajput warrior. Sindhia took the opportunity to attack the city and after a furious struggle in which fighting erupted from outer walls to the Red Fort he broke the defences. Thousand of Afghans were stripped and dragged through the streets reviled by the city folk who they had tormented. The Mughals fled in utter defeat whilst Ghulam Qadir was captured. The blind Mughal Emperor begged Sindhia for deliverance with the break up of the Muslim alliance. Indeed it proved the last Islamic enterprise to rule India. The unbroken resistance of the Hindu clans throughout the medieval period had prevented the Turks and Mughals alike from creating little more than armed settlements in the plains of India. Vast tracts remained under the control of Hindu states and warlords which by the close of the 1600ââ¬â¢s had lead to huge uprisings which first shook and them brought tumbling down the corrupt edifence of the Mughals. And now a hundred years later the last vestiges of empire combined in a last alliance to break the millennia old resistance of the Hindus to end in utter defeat. Ismail Beg became a wanderer with a handful of followers whilst Ghulam Qadir lay in prison and then to gratify the vengeance of the blinded Shah Alam Sindhia ordered the Afghan prince to be dragged through the streets of Delhi for execution and his dead body to be hung from a tree. By 1792 Sindhias triumph was complete. His hold over the Maratha Empire in the name of the Peshwa was sealed and defacto over the nominal empire of the Mughals. His name and fame had brought the once proud Mughals and Afghans to their knees and humbled the power of the otherwise victorious British Empire. As a colossus he strode over the plains of Northern India with the inspirational cavalry tactics of his noble predecessor Shivaji the Great combining it with the new model of Europeanised infantry, the campoo regiments. Factories for armaments had been established and the economic stability after decades of warfare was now ensured. The remaining Muslims states, barring that of Tipu Sultan only survived due to the protection and economic pillaging of the British who in their turn shied away from confronting the mighty Sindhia. His calm nature amidst the turmoilââ¬â¢s of the age stood in stark contrast to his adversaries. His devotion to his spiritual Guru and an unshakeable faith enabled him to deal with confront and defeat the most implacable enemies. His understanding of the political and historical landscape enabled him to complete the military defeat of the remaining Muhamadan powers in the Indian subcontinent and establish a system capable of taking on the European encroachments. His death in 1795 at a relatively young age changed the political landscape but his contribution is not forgotten or can it be underestimated. He showed that the combination of indigenous innovation and value could not only compete with but emerge victorious over a millennia of genocidal attacks and the tidal wave of monolithic globalisation. By Sandeep Sharma. Just a taster from the upcoming Hindu History site www.hinduhistory.info History of the Maratha nation - Bharatvarsh2 - 10-01-2010 http://ahilyabaiholkar.wordpress.com/ History of the Maratha nation - Bharatvarsh2 - 10-06-2010 <<<Dear Sandhya ji, Thank you for taking up the issue, however in your article you make an unwarranted snide remark against the peshavA-s, specifically the Greatest of them bAlAjI bAjIrAva, which is not only unwarranted but also inaccurate on account of maharaTTA history. You wrote: <<When in his teens in 1645 CE, he (shivAjI) began administering his father's estate under a personalized seal of authority in Sanskrit, a hint that he envisaged independence and adhered to the Hindu traditionââ¬Â¦ The Peshwa, in contrast, accepted the Persian script under the influence of a Muslim courtesan, and narrow-mindedly refused to convert her to Hindu dharma despite her keenness to embrace the faith. As a result, the Marathas bowed to the Mughal emperor when they reached Delhi and missed a historic opportunity to re-establish Hindu rule; a classic case of muscle without mind, power without political sense! The rest is history.>> First of all, in context of the then prevailing times, usage of Persian was a lesser evil, since we like it or not, it was the language of diplomacy and politics in contemporary times, and was used by even Hindu kings in their correspondences, before, during and after the times of cHatrapati as well as peshavA, up until English reduced that language in the status and eventually replaced it. The then usage of Persian was no worse than your and mine writing today in English language. Coming back to shivAjIââ¬â¢s time, even in his court Persian titles and terms gave way to saMskR^ita ones, very late in his regime. Contemporary chronicler sabhAsada writes that it was not until the rAjyAbhiSheka ceremony of shivAjI that the ââ¬ÅSanskrit titles were ordered to be used in future to designate their offices, and the Persian titles hitherto current were abolished.ââ¬Â Thus it is then at the rAjyAbhiSheka time that peshavA himself became mukhya pradhAna, majmuadAr became AmAtya, waqiA-navIs mantrI, shurU-navIs sachiva, dabIr became sumanta, and sar-i-naubat senApati, and of course under the guidance of none other than the then peshavA, the father of the more brilliant bAjIrAva. In his aspiration of rejuvenating and re-establishing the Hindu institutions, including the language of saMskR^ita, shivAjI was guided by his far-sighted peshavA, in commissioning of a handbook of working saMskR^ita for his new-founded state, to later become famous. Not only this, but a whole chest of letters written by shivAjI to his North Indian contemporaries, during the early days, used to be in Persian. For instance, look up his famed letter he sent for maharaja jayasiMha kacHavAhA of jaipura (then ambara) when he was besieged by the latter. The letter published by bAbU jagannAtha dAsa of vArANasI, is in Persian but speaks about establishing a Hindu collaboration to root out the Islamic menace from dillI: ââ¬ÅO Great Monarch mahArAjA jaisiMhaââ¬Â¦ you are a valiant kShatriya, why do you use your strength to further the power of the dynasty of bAbUr? Why shed the costly Hindu blood to make the red-faced musalmAns victorious? ... If you had come to conquer me, you would find my head humbly at the path you tread, but you come as a deputy of the tyrant, and I can not decide how I behave towards youââ¬Â¦ If you fight in championing our Hindu Religion, you shall find me your comrade in armsââ¬Â¦ Being so brave and valiant, it behoves you as a Great Hindu General to lead our joint armies against Emperor instead, and indeed let us go together and conquer that city of dillI, let us shed our blood in preserving the ancient religion which we and our ancestors have followed... etcââ¬Â. The above letter of shivAjI is, not in maharaTTI or hindI, but in Persian, so are several others among shivAjIââ¬â¢s letters and orders. One must bear the contemporary situation in mind, before blaming bAjIrAva of ââ¬Åin contrast, accepting the Persian script under the influence of a Muslim courtesanââ¬Â. In fact, peshavA-s, and in particular this one, as well as his successors, did the most meaningful service, than any one else since the days of vijayanagara empire, in reviving the devabhAShA. This is acknowledged even by the arch-saMskR^ita-bashers like Sheldon Pollock in his ââ¬ÅThe Death of Sanskritââ¬Â, where he quoted a stanza of a gujarAtI poet who ââ¬Åsensed that some important transformation had occurred at the beginning of the second millennium, which made the great literary courts of the age, such as Bhojaââ¬â¢s, the stuff of legend (which last things often become); that the cultivation of Sanskrit by eighteenth-century rulers like the Peshwas of Maharashtra was too little too late; that the Sanskrit cultural order of his own time was sheer nostalgic ceremony.ââ¬Â You have it seems not studied the contribution of peshavA-s for the revival of saMskR^ita, otherwise you would know that after kAshI, it was pUnA which had become the greatest center of saMskR^ita revival in the eighteenth century. A flourishing saMskR^ita university was established by peshavA here, and a network of smaller schools, or Tol, as they were called, throughout the empire, to educate people in the devabhAShA. Many poetries and commentaries were produced here, as much as the political situation could afford. I was informed by a researcher from Grece, whom I once ran into, when he was in India to do some researches about Greeks living in India in the Eighteenth century, that peshavA probably contracted a couple of Greeks from vArANasI, to help his scholars in pUnA translate some of the Greek Classics of Homer into saMskR^ita. I can not say how true it is, but such impression does reflect on the services of peshavA, especially the once you blame, in reviving saMskR^ita. Even bAla ga~NgAdhara tilaka once spoke of the peshavA's services of reviving the ancient Hindu mother-language. Coming to the ââ¬ÅMuslim courtesanââ¬Â, you refer to mastAnI here, whom bAjIrAva ââ¬Ånarrow-mindedly refused to convert to Hindu dharmaââ¬Â. Once again, it is nothing short of blasphemy against the greatest Hindu Warrior and Strategist we have known since cHatrapati himself. mastAnI was a daughter of a Hindu father and a Moslem courtesan, and was gifted to bAjIrAv as a companion by cHatrasAla, after bAjIrAva had decisively hammered the Nizam of Hyderabad in the classic battle of Bhopal. (Incidentally, it is from this campaign, that he victoriously returned not only with mastAnI, but also bhUShaNa, who was living his retired life at bundelakhaNDa under patronage of cHatrasAla, and who accepted bAjIrAvââ¬â¢s invitation with object of relating to shAhUjI his reminisces of shivAjI ââ¬â a poetry that came to be later known as shiva-bAvanI, as it has 52 pada-s, and related important milestones of shivAjIââ¬â¢s career. The famed ââ¬ÅsivAjI na hoto tau sunnata hota sabakIââ¬Â is from this work.) It was not bAjIrAva, whose ââ¬Ånarrow mindednessââ¬Â it was to not allow the re-conversion of mastAnI, but that of the moronic brAhmaNa-s who had even out-casted bAjIrAv himself on accusations of eating meat, drinking wine, smoking tobacco, and keeping Moslem wife etc. (You must know that a son of bAjIrAva through mastAnI, named by bAjIrAv as kR^iShNarAva, and raised privately by bAjIrAva as a brAhmaNa, and some pUnA traditions have it that his father had even performed his thread-ceremony, but he was not accepted as a Hindu by the more orthodox and was forced to live like a Moslem, and take the name of shamshir bahAdur. This son of bAjI valiantly fought against abdAlI in the battle of pAnIpat and fell in the field at the age of 27). Even the thread ceremony and marriages of bAjIrAvaââ¬â¢s legitimate sons even were blockaded by the orthodox chitapAvana-s, if either bAjIrAv or mastAnI came anywhere near the ceremonies, and indeed bAjIrAv did not attend these! bAjIrAvaââ¬â¢s younger brother, chimanAjI appA, the hero of vassein, too never accepted mastAnI, and even tried to eliminate her once when bAjIrAv was away leading the final battle of his life, in finally crushing the Hyderabad Nizam one more time before his untimely death. Coming to ââ¬ÅAs a result, the Marathas bowed to the Mughal emperor when they reached Delhi and missed a historic opportunity to re-establish Hindu ruleââ¬Â, the blame is misplaced. Indeed, a closer analysis will show that bAjIrAvââ¬â¢s energies were continuously driven towards striking down the most potent Moslem power center of India, the mughal seat in dillI, and he was restrained from completely taking them out only by shAhUjI himself. One must read the desperate letters exchanged between him and the maharaTTA generals and his envoyes in dillI court, at the time of the invasion of dillI by nAdirshAh from Persia. In one letter there is a clear reference of waiting for the ââ¬Åmost perfect timeââ¬Â for ââ¬Åeradicating the moghal seat and placing the crown of the Emporer on the rANA of mevADaââ¬Â. Refer to Vol 2 of New History of Marathas by G S Sardesai for the complete letter. It was shAhUjI who decided that any misadventure, as he felt, probably correctly, that maharaTTA power was spread too thin for any such move, and who issued a decree to this effect to his generals. You cite bhUShaNa, but ignore what even bhUShaNa says about bAjIrAva! He calls bAjI a ââ¬ÅbAjaââ¬Â (hawk of hunt), who is ready to prey upon the partridges of dillI (the moghals), but is obedient to his hunter in sitArA (shAhU). On that note, you are also not correct when you say that bhUShaNa ââ¬Åquit the Mughal capital in 1671ââ¬Â¦ composed Shiv Bhooshan, a biographyââ¬Â. bhUShaNa was neither a native of Moghal Capital, nor an employee of Moghals. He had left his Kanpur home quite early, had gone to several Hindu rulers, like the Kings of kumAyUM, and of chitrakUTa, before finally reaching shivAjI after hearing of his miraculous flight from AgrA. Finally, his first book shivarAja bhUShaNa is not a biography, nor did he intend it to be, but it is a book of poetics as he himself says in its preface, that ââ¬Åthe valour of shivAjI induced in the poet heart of bhUShaNa, the intention to revive the native poetics, by creating a blessed collection of meters, embellishments and phrases, which is what he now intends to take up.ââ¬Â Please pardon my nitpicking, but your blame on bAjIrAva is a major error which needed immediate correction. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hinducivilization/message/41867>>> <<<<<<It is questionable if Bajirao had conquered Delhi then Maratha Rule would have continued in India. The Marathas lost out to Ahmad Shah Durani , as far as I can think, it was due to fighting on a disadvantageous turf - far off from the Maratha Land, ( b ) Durani's tactics were superior. The Maratha forces were practically wiped out on the very first day itself.>>> Anand ji, There is little cause-effect connection between bAjIrAv's strategy of encircling dillI but not wiping out moghal rule, and the loss of field to abdAlI three decades after bAjIrAv's death. In my opinion the contours of bAjIrAv's thinking can be summarized thus: A) It was apparent to him that moghals had already been reduced to nominal powers, and real military strength of moslems was now moving towards decentralized independent hands like Bengal, Hyderabad, Awadh, the Afcrican Black Moslems etc., (and the yet upcoming Hyder Ali in Mysore). <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' /> North Indian Hindus, especially rAjapUta-s, were still not ready to weild a common front, much less submit to maharaTTA-s. sikh, jATa, and gorakhA upstarts were yet to appear prominently on the Radar. C) He therefore felt, quite correctly, that the policy has to be two fold: one, somehow not letting the Moslem states to unite under a common banner and open a common front. two: keeping rAjapUta-s in good humour and not alarming them in any way. This was possible by pretending for time being to be a friend and protector of the dillI crown, rather than a foe and predator. D) This pretension enabled him on two fronts: one, being able to fight one Moslem power at a time, e.g. the battle of Bhopal, where moghal and awadh remained neutral while bAjIrAv totally decimated the nizAm's forces ending his ambitions towards the North. two, rAjapUta-s were not alarmed, as he did not threaten to replace moghal suzerainty over rAjapUta-s by the maharaTTA one, by presenting themselves only to be the first among equals in carrying out the task of Hindu Independence. Refer to his frantic exchange of letters with rAjapUtas, and urgency of going to dholapura to establish friendship with jaisiMha second of jaipur, and sending bhUShaNa on a tour of rAjapUtAnA where he conveyed this message to many houses. bAjIrAv was quite successful in gaining respect and friendship of North Indian Hindu powers. He became even a personal friend of many important figures like jaisiMha. In fact, did not the East India Company imitate exactly the same strategy as bAjIrAva, several decades later, and with complete success? Clive and Cornwallis imitated him in great detail -- including posing to be a Hindu Saviour -- but that subject on some other occasion. E) shAhU was of the opinion that maharaTTA administration has to be more solidified, if expansion has to be effective. This was quite correct too. Since the days of shivAjI, feudal structure, the jAgIradArI and mansabadArI, which had been the hallmark of moghal administration, was frowned upon. Generals used to be paid employees of state, not independent jamindars. No fiefs were allowed, no personal grant of lands, no permanent subedArI etc. a letter of shivAjI written to his eldest son-in-law clearly reflects this where he declined the request for a grant of jAgIr to him, explaining his policy. But this was slightly modified after bAjIrAv when a fort of region was granted 'permanently' to an officer. He himself granted dhAr in MP to the pawAr Generals, (dhAra was thought to be rightfully belonging to the pawAra-s, the descendants of Bhojadeva the paramAra). But soon after his death and that of shAhU, later a vacuum arose in the maharaTTA core, which later peshavA-s tried to fill, and federalist system became the accepted order. We see the rise of sindhiyA, holkar, gAyakavADa, bhonsalA etc. eventually leading to the total decline of the central authority. F) bAjIrAva was very clear that the Europeans represented a very real danger, and had decided to not let them play any role in the politics of India. Therefore his urgency of trying a complete wipeout of Portugese from maharaTTA lands. G) Militarily, his huge army consisted only of cavalry, with little or no infantry, not unlike afghAns. He had pioneered the art of how cavalry should move and fight in open fields, miles beyond their homeland, and in this it seems taken cue from Changez Khan's cavalry tactics. (read a wonderful essay by the AchArya of manasataraMgiNI on this subject.) H) Which means that on account of unmatched mobility of troops, he was confident of being able to rapidly reach the trouble zone -- reducing the need for large permanent encampments of maharaTTA troops. This also allowed him to let moghals remain in seat and dependant upon maharaTTA-s for protection, while he went about weakening the other more potent Moslem centers. Coming to the loss of pAnIpat several decades later. It was a result of exactly not following the policy of bAjIrAva. maharaTTA-s were openly frowned upon all over India, hated by Hindus of North India as much as by those of deep south, bengal and Orissa, due to their ill deeds by now. They were looked upon as brigands and bandits rather than soldiers of Hindu Independence. National sense had almost evaporated from them, and replaced by simple lust and greed, propelled more by a lacking central authority. There are many more resons, tactical in nature, of the loss of pAnIpat, but this was the root cause for most part -- they had lost the moral right. But my insistence remains -- sandhyA jI has done great disservice to the memory of this National Hero. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hinducivilization/message/41889>>> <<<Ravilochanan ji, will you please elaborate on the 1734 loot of nAthadwArA temple? Which source informs this? I have of course heard about the sack of nAthadwArA temple before, but the year is extremely unlikely. It would be more in line with the later maharaTTA sins of looting of cash at tirupati shrine, or extracting the poll tax from hindU pilgrims visiting the purI temple (that too at an exhorbitant rate of ten rupees per head from the pilgrims from north and 5 rupees from those coming from southern countries! quite proto-Thackerays!) But all of these were events of 1750-60s. I doubt the year you mention because I had once looked up mevADa's attitude towards bAjIrAva's through mevADian sources itself, especially the personal correspondances between mahArANA and maharaTTA-s, and at least the neighbourhood of this year is extremely unlikely since I could not find any mention of such an obvious fact which should have otherwise been 'in your face'. I shall be grateful if you can point out what are the sources which substantiate this claim. Even Tod, who hardly few decades later wrote detailed description of mevADa does not mention anything like this. In my visits to nAthadwArA I have failed to get any details about this too, while of course there is evidence of loot after 1800. Of course, bAjIrAva had visited mevADa in 1735 after his victorious campaign in mAlavA, desirous of seeking an interview with the then mahArANA jagata siMha at udaipura. While maharANA declined to personally see a mere General of a lesser king, he sent all ceremonial honours suitable for bAjIrAv, and in a written instruction asked his Prime Minister to receive bAjIrAva with all pomp and show, and grant him a status similar to a prince. Also interesting is that while bAjIrAva came to mevADa to negotiate the treaty of chauth payments, the respects he and shAhU pay to rANA are unparalleled! You may be interested in the translated text of the letter preserved in mevADA archives and produced partly by Tod: shAhU to rANA via bAjIrAva: "svasti shrI; worthy of all upamA-s; from whose actions results gains; the regent of vighna-hartA gaNapati; the amR^ita that has emerged through the churning of the ocean of Arya kShatriya kula; as bright as Sun; who has made a river from the tears of the wives of our enemies; shrIman mahArAjAdhirAja mahArANA shrI jagata siMha jI; chief of all the princes of Aryakula; this writes shrIman shAhU cHatrapati let his humble rAm-rAm reach you!... Here all is well with your blessings; always honour me by good accounts which I am always expecting as source of happiness; Your favour was received by paNDita pradhAna with great respect; ... ; let your favour between us be enlarged; what more do I write; yours etc..." rANA wrote to his Prime Minister bihArIlAl to treat this officer with a similar dignity and protocol with which his own son the crown prince of mevADa was treated, also remarking, "malhAra had come last year (referring to holkar), but this one (bAjIrAv) is enormously more powerful, treat him such." A nominal annual payment of Rs 1,60,000 was agreed between bAjIrAv and bihArI, payable in three equal parts to sindhiyA, holkar and pawAra. This treaty was kept for ten years, but after this maharaTTA-s became looters, making yearly raid of rAjapUtAnA, bengAl, Orissa for no reason other than extracting money. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hinducivilization/message/41905>>> <<<Radha Ji, Better to read the maharaTTA history written by MaharaTTI-s themselves who have produced an excellent breed of historians, with the likes of professionals like Profs R G Bhandarkar and D K Bhandarkar, Vinayak Rajwade, Kashinath Sane, Vasudev Khare, Dattatraya Parasnis, Vishvanath Mandlik as well as equally brilliant although non-professionals like Justice Mahadev Ranade. Even maharaTTI political thinkers like Balagangadghara Tilak and Vinayak Savarkar were fine scholars and history writers, in particular Tilak who considering his situation did a very good job as a native Indologist and historian of maharaTTA age, writing mostly from the prison cells; the credit of identifying the correct birth date of shivAjI goes to him. In History-writing I think, maharaTTA people are second only to the tremendously more polished and brilliant, and my favourite, the va~NgadeshI-s, who have given some of the best historians Hindu race has ever produced: the likes of Jadunath Sarkar, D C Sircar and Prof R C Majumdar. But sorry I digressed, on maharaTTA history, if one can understand maharaTTI language then one should read the mammoth 'marAThyAnchyA itihAsAchI sAdhane' of V K Rajwade. For those of us with disadvantage of not knowing maharaTTI, the basic readings in English are: - New History of Marathas (3 vols) by G S Sardesai - History of the Maratha People by Kincaid - Papers on Maratha History and Introduction to Peshava's Diaries by Mahadev Govind Ranade published by RAS Bombay With focus on Shivaji: - Life and Times of Shivaji by Sir Jadunath Sarkar - Grand Rebel: An impression of Shivaji founder of the Maratha Empire by Kincaid Those only interested in an outline may read: - Main Currents of Maratha History by G S Sardesai Most of the above are in public domain, and available from free downloads from several library sites. Let me know if you can not find. It is tragic but true that since the take over of History Research and writing by the secularites, further research on such important subjects as the Histories of maharaTTA, rAjapUta, jATa, sikha, gorakhA, vijayanagara, and other events of Hindu revivals has almost come to a halt if not indeed reversed. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hinducivilization/message/42033>>> Above posts were from Bodhi, thought people might be interested since they contain some valuable historical info. <<<Dear Sri Tiwari Pranaam!! I found this info when I was going through a history of Nathdwara published by the Vallabh sect based on their texts (it was available at SriNathji mandir last year). It was a detailed history of the temple. It had been claimed that the temple was looted at least twice - once by Holkar in 1734 and once by Daulat Rao Scindia (the real scoundrel) around 1800. I'll try to get a copy of the book when I'll visit Nathdwara in a month or so. A friend of mine has 'forgotten' that he borrowed the book from me. My statement was based on that book. Btw, the book stated that the Holkars had looted the wealth of the temple and the town. It did not state that Baji Rao was present in the raid. I personally believe that it might have been a case of personal robbery by Holkars. But if this is true, then it turns out that Baji Rao was not able to control his sardars beyond a limit. It is indeed very sad that a great statesman like Baji Rao (who destroyed the Portuguese demons in N.Konkan) had to contend with such robbers as his sardars. The above info aside, Your translation of the letter is very much appreciated. I have never seen tis document. Though I have read that Shahu had great respect for the House of Sisodiyas, Guardians of the legacy of Bappa Rawal (from whom Shivaji was descended), I have never seen a copy of this letter. Thanks for the same. I noted that the letter cited by you refers to Maharana mentioning about Malhar's visit to Mewar. It calls him very powerful and Baji Rao as more powerful than Malhar. Is there a reason behind it? Does it point to some misbehavior by Malhar in Mewar before he was reigned in? regards Ravilochanan http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hinducivilization/message/41955>>> |