Newsletter
Email:
Poll: Like Our New Look?
Do you like our new look & feel?
Home | Indian History | Aryan Invasion Theory
total: 5 | displaying: 1 - 5

Aryan Invasion Theory

Indology and Indologists a Study in Motives and People - Part I

The study is always carried out to be of benefit to the people who undertake the study and there is little or no benefit to the subject of the study who may end up sacrificing his life for the ?cause?. Indological studies or the study of the Indic people in a scholarly and serious manner can be broken up into 6 major categories in some cases with overlapping time periods
Full story

Nationalism and Civilizational Pride

Nationalism as a cultural construct: The two words, civilisation and culture are often used synonymously. Thus civilisation is defined as ?the quality of excellence in thought, manners and taste; intellectual refinement; generosity and civilization". And, culture is defined as ?the totality of socially transmitted behaviour patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought?....
Full story

Romila Thapar Defends the Aryan Invasion Theory!

However, just when these corrections were about to be accepted, a group of traditional India-bashers (e.g. Michael Witzel), non-scholars (e.g., astrophysicist Rajesh Kocchar[1]), Indian Marxists (e.g., D N Jha, Romila Thapar), non-specialists in ancient India (e.g. Sudha Shenoy, Homi Bhabha), scholars alleged to have demonstrated Eurocentric bias in the past (e.g., M Tosi[2] of Italy) and obscure linguists wrote an arrogant and pompous letter (on Harvard University letterhead, signed by Michael Witzel with endorsing signatures from 46 other ?scholars?) to the State Board, addressing themselves as ?all equally famous world class specialists? on ancient Indian history. The letter alleged that all these Hindu groups proposing edits in the textbooks under review were dangerous Hindu nationalists who were somehow connected with the slaughter of 1000 people in Gujarat, and whose friends in India routinely discriminate against millions of Indian minority members and Dalits! ...
Full story
image

The AIT : More than meets the eye

There are some Indians today who are convinced that the subcontinent's population can be classified into Indo-Aryan and Dravidian ethnic groups. Ignoring the fact that Indo-Aryan and Dravidian are defined as being merely language families and so do not denote ethnicity at all, their conviction shows that it has now become a question of identity. The Indo-European language family represents a model of the world which incorporates a view of history, of population dispersal and of language diffusion. Within its framework are to be found the now-familiar concepts of Aryan, Dravidian, Indo-European languages and their subfamilies, as well as the notion that at some point in its history, India accommodated entrants from Eurasia who supposedly brought with them India's first Indo-European language and an equally alien culture....
Full story
image

The AIT : More than meets the eye - Endnotes

Endnotes for the article The AIT : More than meets the eye....
Full story
Featured author